Abstract

There is an urgent need to reduce drastically the rate at which biodiversity is declining worldwide. Phylogenetic methods are increasingly being recognised as providing a useful framework for predicting future losses, and guiding efforts for pre-emptive conservation actions. In this study, we used a reconstructed phylogenetic tree of angiosperm species of the Eastern Arc Mountains – an important African biodiversity hotspot – and described the distribution of extinction risk across taxonomic ranks and phylogeny. We provide evidence for both taxonomic and phylogenetic selectivity in extinction risk. However, we found that selectivity varies with IUCN extinction risk category. Vulnerable species are more closely related than expected by chance, whereas endangered and critically endangered species are not significantly clustered on the phylogeny. We suggest that the general observation for taxonomic and phylogenetic selectivity (i.e. phylogenetic signal, the tendency of closely related species to share similar traits) in extinction risks is therefore largely driven by vulnerable species, and not necessarily the most highly threatened. We also used information on altitudinal distribution and climate to generate a predictive model of at-risk species richness, and found that greater threatened species richness is found at higher altitude, allowing for more informed conservation decision making. Our results indicate that evolutionary history can help predict plant susceptibility to extinction threats in the hyper-diverse but woefully-understudied Eastern Arc Mountains, and illustrate the contribution of phylogenetic approaches in conserving African floristic biodiversity where detailed ecological and evolutionary data are often lacking.

Highlights

  • The future of biodiversity is a matter of increasing concern among ecologists [1,2,3]

  • We investigated three major questions on extinction risk in the threatened flora of the Eastern Arc: 1) Is the distribution of extinction risks phylogenetically non-random? 2) If extinction risk co-varies with phylogeny, which evolutionary model best explains the phylogenetic distribution of risks? 3) How does the distribution of threatened species relate to ecological factors such as elevation, precipitation and temperature? We show that phylogeny can help explain the taxonomic distribution of species vulnerabilities, a pattern that is best fit by a non-constant evolutionary model of extinction risk, and that elevation is an important predictor of threatened species

  • We evaluated phylogenetic signal in extinction risk directly using the D-statistic on both the incompletely resolved Phylomatic tree topology and thinned trees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The future of biodiversity is a matter of increasing concern among ecologists [1,2,3]. Biodiversity is under a sustained attack from multiple factors including introduction of invasive species [4], habitat loss due to human activities [5,6] and changing climate [7,8]. Human activities are driving species loss through overexploitation of resources, and alteration of natural habitats [5,6]. Climate change is predicted to be the major driver of extinction in the future due to lags in the ability of species to adjust their physiology and life histories (e.g. phenology) to match new climate regime [7,8] and limitations in their ability to track shifting climates by adjusting their range distributions in an increasingly fragmented environment. Taxonomic groups are not at risks (taxonomic selectivity) [10,11,12], and second, extinction risk may be linked to specific traits (e.g. body size) [15]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call