Abstract

Most eukaryotes have at least some genes interrupted by introns. While it is well accepted that introns were already present at moderate density in the last eukaryote common ancestor, the conspicuous diversity of intron density among genomes suggests a complex evolutionary history, with marked differences between phyla. The question of the rates of intron gains and loss in the course of evolution and factors influencing them remains controversial. We have investigated a single gene family, alpha-amylase, in 55 species covering a variety of animal phyla. Comparison of intron positions across phyla suggests a complex history, with a likely ancestral intronless gene undergoing frequent intron loss and gain, leading to extant intron/exon structures that are highly variable, even among species from the same phylum. Because introns are known to play no regulatory role in this gene and there is no alternative splicing, the structural differences may be interpreted more easily: intron positions, sizes, losses or gains may be more likely related to factors linked to splicing mechanisms and requirements, and to recognition of introns and exons, or to more extrinsic factors, such as life cycle and population size. We have shown that intron losses outnumbered gains in recent periods, but that “resets” of intron positions occurred at the origin of several phyla, including vertebrates. Rates of gain and loss appear to be positively correlated. No phase preference was found. We also found evidence for parallel gains and for intron sliding. Presence of introns at given positions was correlated to a strong protosplice consensus sequence AG/G, which was much weaker in the absence of intron. In contrast, recent intron insertions were not associated with a specific sequence. In animal Amy genes, population size and generation time seem to have played only minor roles in shaping gene structures.

Highlights

  • Over thirty years ago, the discovery that eukaryotic genes were split, interrupted by non-coding DNA (e.g. [1,2,3]), caused a revolution in biology

  • Much progress in the debate has been brought by the general effort of genome sequencing of a number of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, which has shown that (1) all sequenced prokaryotes lack spliceosomal introns and the elements of the splicing machinery, and (2) most eukaryotes sequenced to date have at least a few spliceosomal introns, and all have elements of the spliceosome [9]

  • Amylase genes will be considered free of this kind of constraints, so that the observed structural differences may be interpreted more : intron positions, sizes, losses or gains may be more likely related to factors linked to splicing mechanisms and requirements, and recognition of introns and exons, or to more extrinsic factors, such as life cycle and population size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The discovery that eukaryotic genes were split, interrupted by non-coding DNA (e.g. [1,2,3]), caused a revolution in biology. Much progress in the debate has been brought by the general effort of genome sequencing of a number of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, which has shown that (1) all sequenced prokaryotes lack spliceosomal introns and the elements of the splicing machinery, and (2) most eukaryotes sequenced to date have at least a few spliceosomal introns, and all have elements of the spliceosome [9] This demonstrates, according to many authors, that introns have been inserted in eukaryotes, at a very early stage of their evolution, so that all extant eukaryotes stem from an intron-bearing, and potentially intron-rich ancestor [10,11,12]. As Lynch and Richardson said [16], ‘‘it is likely that few, if any, of today’s eukaryotes could survive without introns’’

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.