Phylogenesis and ontogenesis of intelligence future officer

Abstract

Introduction. The article raises the question of the causes, conditions and circumstances of the development of intelligence, the existence and possibility of the emergence of intelligence in ontogenesis or phylogenesis. It seems necessary to understand the features of the formation of personality and subjectivity in individual or collective development, which, in turn, requires an understanding of issues relevant to the domestic intelligentsia: the relationship / conjugation of personal and public, public and state, state and personal. At the same time, intercultural and interpersonal communication acts as a real field for objectification and deobjectification of values and the realization of intelligence as a personality trait, and reflection is the mechanism for improving intelligence.Materials and Methods. The study of the social existence of intelligence in ontogenesis and phylogenies was carried out from the standpoint of modern psychological approaches: axiological; activity; systemic; subjective. Within the framework of these scientific positions, the main methods for obtaining scientific information in this study were: analysis; abstraction; analogy; deduction; generalization; synthesis; comparison.Results. Intelligence is a dynamic structure, the core of which is the value-semantic sphere, a high level of culture and education, and the field for the implementation of intelligence is social subjective activity. At the same time, interpersonal communication with representatives of the intelligentsia or subjects of intelligence is a necessary condition for its development in the personality structure. Communication acts as a medium and source for the development of intelligence. Since intelligence always manifests itself in relation to another, others, nature and oneself, it develops in various forms of collective interaction and communication.Discussions and Conclusions. The communicative and reflexive nature of intelligence, as well as its focus on the implementation of the ideas of justice and equality between social subjects, allow us to say that the real field of its implementation and objectification into objects of social activity is inters objective interaction. This, in turn, is realized and functions in the field of culture, the processes of objectification and deobjectification of values. Intelligence is a dynamic structure, the core of which is the value-semantic sphere, a high level of culture and education, and the field for the implementation of intelligence is social subjective activity.