Abstract

Photosynthetic induction times and photoinhibition in relation to simulated sunflecks (sudden increase of irradiance from 20 to 1,500 μmol m−2 s−1) were examined in leaves of co-occurring Fagus lucida (a deciduous tree) and Castanopsis lamontii (an evergreen tree) saplings grown either in a beech forest understory or in an adjacent open site during a late rainy season. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) understory leaves would display faster photosynthetic induction times and greater photoinhibition than open-grown leaves; and (2) evergreen species would have slower photosynthetic induction times and lighter photoinhibition than deciduous species. Times to reach 90% of maximal CO2 assimilation rate (t 90%A ) and stomatal conductance $$ (t_{{90\% g_{{\text{s}}} }}) $$ did not differ between species, but showed faster by 3–5 min in open-grown leaves than understory leaves due to higher initial stomatal conductance (g s initial) and induction state 1 min into simulated sunflecks (IS1min) in the former. Our analysis across the published data on photosynthetic induction of 48 broad-leaved woody species again revealed the negative correlations between t 90%A and either g s initial or IS1min, and the similarity of t 90%A and $$ t_{{90\% g_{{\text{s}}} }} $$ between evergreen and deciduous species. Measurements of maximum PSII photochemical efficiency (F v/F m) indicated that photoinhibition occurred in saplings in any of the growth habitats during sunfleck-induced photosynthetic induction. Despite no interspecific differences in the degree of photoinhibition, understory leaves of both species suffered heavier photoinhibition than open-grown leaves, as indicated by a stronger decrease of F v/F m in the former. Dynamic changes in the quantum yields of PSII photochemistry and ΔpH- and xanthophyll-regulated thermal dissipation and adjustments in the partitioning of electron flow between assimilative and non-assimilative processes were functional to resist photoinhibition. However, such photoinhibition, together with stomatal and biochemical limitations, would decrease carbon gain during simulated sunflecks, particularly in understory leaves.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call