Abstract
Although photoperiodism is undoubtedly one of the most important functions of the circadian system, the role of circadian clock genes remains unclear. We compared the expression of period and Clock genes in the head of the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus, kept under diapause promoting short days (SD) and diapause-preventing long days (LD), using an RNase protection assay. There was only a weak diurnal rhythm in both period and Clock mRNA under LD and no rhythm under SD. Under SD, however, the level of period mRNA was about tenfold and that of clock mRNA about twofold higher than under LD. In a mutant that does not undergo diapause, even under SD, levels of both transcripts were low in both photoperiods. The differential regulation of the levels of two clock gene transcripts in a photoperiodic mutant, demonstrated for the first time in an animal species, strongly indicates a link between photoperiod, the magnitude of clock gene expression, and developmental outputs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.