Abstract

Recently, evidence has accumulated to indicate that the photoperiodic control of floral induction is mediated by an endogenous rhythm with periods of approximately 24 hours (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21,22). It has long been known that the floral response of Biloxi soybean varies with the length of the photoperiod (4, 5, 6, 7,18). The optimum response with 24-hour treatment cycles is obtained with photoperiods between 6 and 10 hours and normally no flowering is produced with photoperiods longer than 14 or perhaps 14Y2 hours (1, 28). Hamner (18), however, has shown that if a dark period of 16 hours is given in each cycle after photoperiods of different lengths, flowering is obtained with photoperiods as long as 16 and 18 hours. In those experiments, however, the cycle duration was varied with the different lengths of photoperiods given. Since Nanda and Hamner (23) have demonstrated a periodic variation in floral response as a function of cycle durations, it was difficult to predict what results might be obtained with various photoperiods given in long cycles of standard duration. In the following experiments a 72-hour, or tridiurnal, cycle was used to further assess the effects of light breaks and differential photoperiod durations on photoperiodic and rhythmic flowering responses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call