Abstract

Lowfat milk and skim milk were fortified with either oil- or aqueous-based carrier blends of vitamins A and D, in 1-gal poly-ethylene containers, and illuminated up to 72 h with 1080 1× (100 ft-c) at 5°C in a commercial display case. Vitamin A measurments and sensory analyses showed that vitamin A was more stable in 2% lowfat milk than in skim milk regardless of the carrier. The aqueous-based carrier provided more stability in lowfat milk while the oil-based carrier gave more stability in skim milk. Skim milk fortified with the aqueous-based vitamin A had 69% loss, while the unexposed control exhibited only 15% loss of the vitamin. Off-flavors were evident after 6 h in light-exposed 2% lowfat milk with the oil-based vitamin A, but the same milk with aqueous-based vitamin A did not exhibit off-flavors until after 12 h. Both 2% lowfat and skim milk samples exposed to light received similar lowered preference scores compared to nonexposed control samples. When both fortified and nonfortified 2% lowfat and skim milk samples were tasted after exposure to light, the flavor was not significantly different, but were in the unacceptable range.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call