Abstract

The use of a new gel containing aminolevulinic acid and red light (ALAD–PDI) was tested in order to counteract bacterial biofilm growth on different titanium implant surfaces. The varying antibacterial efficacy of ALAD–PDI against biofilm growth on several titanium surfaces was also evaluated. A total of 60 titanium discs (30 machined and 30 double-acid etched, DAE) were pre-incubated with saliva and then incubated for 24 h with Streptococcus oralis to form bacterial biofilm. Four different groups were distinguished: two exposed groups (MACHINED and DAE discs), covered with S. oralis biofilm and subjected to ALAD + PDI, and two unexposed groups, with the same surfaces and bacteria, but without the ALAD + PDI (positive controls). Negative controls were non-inoculated discs alone and combined with the gel (ALAD) without the broth cultures. After a further 24 h of anaerobic incubation, all groups were evaluated for colony-forming units (CFUs) and biofilm biomass, imaged via scanning electron microscope, and tested for cell viability via LIVE/DEAD analysis. CFUs and biofilm biomass had significantly higher presence on unexposed samples. ALAD–PDI significantly decreased the number of bacterial CFUs on both exposed surfaces, but without any statistically significant differences among them. Live/dead staining showed the presence of 100% red dead cells on both exposed samples, unlike in unexposed groups. Treatment with ALAD + red light is an effective protocol to counteract the S. oralis biofilm deposited on titanium surfaces with different tomography.

Highlights

  • Introduction iationsThe role of bacterial biofilm in the etiology and the development of peri-implant disease has been demonstrated [1]

  • We focused on photoinactivation using light-emitting diodes (LEDs) against common pathogens of the oral cavity

  • We present the effect of photodynamic therapy involving the use of a novel gel containing aminolevulinic acid combined with red LED irradiation (ALAD–PDI) on S. oralis biofilm, grown on MACHINED and DAE surfaces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of bacterial biofilm in the etiology and the development of peri-implant disease has been demonstrated [1]. Patients who do not practice proper plaque control are 3.8 times more affected by peri-implantitis compared to those with good oral hygiene habits [2]. Peri-implantitis is a heterogeneous and complex infection. The microbial ecosystem is composed of Gram-negative periodontal pathogens, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedius/nigrescens, and bacterial species that are not associated with periodontitis [3,4]. Peri-implant disease is distinguished between the reversible form, denoted mucositis, and the irreversible one, denoted peri-implantitis [5]. A recent Consensus report highlighted that the only risk factors of peri-implantitis for which exist robust scientific evidence are poor plaque control, history of severe periodontitis, and lack of regular care [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call