Abstract

AbstractPhotochemical CO2 reduction reactions catalyzed by trans(Cl)‐[Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] (L=4,4′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru4 dmb), 5,5′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru5 dmb) or 6,6′‐dimethyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine (Ru6 dmb)) are investigated in N,N‐dimethylacetamide (DMA)/water (9:1 v/v) containing [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as the photosensitizer and 1‐benzyl‐1,4‐dihydronicotinamide (BNAH) as the electron donor. The reduction potentials and the density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal quite similar results for the complexes, however their catalytic efficiencies are significantly different. Ru6 dmb selectively yields CO as the reduction product with lower catalytic rates than the others. Ru4 dmb and Ru5 dmb produce both CO and HCOO− at very similar activities when the catalyst concentration is low. However, the catalytic rates for Ru5 dmb are higher than those of Ru4 dmb at a higher concentration of the catalysts, where the rate‐determining step is not in the catalytic cycle but in the electron supplying one. The results are discussed in terms of back electron transfer from the catalyst to the photosensitizer or the cage escape yield for the sensitizer–catalyst encounter complex.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call