Abstract

A charge-shift type of photoinduced electron-transfer reactions from various electron donors to the singlet excited state of 10-decylacridinium cation (DeAcrH+) in a nonpolar solvent (benzene) is found to be as efficient as those of 10-methylacridinium cation (MeAcrH+) and DeAcrH+ in a polar solvent (acetonitrile). Irradiation of the absorption bands of MeAcrH+ in acetonitrile solution containing tetraalkyltin compounds (R(4)Sn) results in the efficient and selective reduction of MeAcrH+ to yield the 10-methyl-9-alkyl-9,10-dihydroacridine (AcrHR). The same type of reaction proceeds in benzene when MeAcrH+ is replaced by DeAcrH+ which is soluble in benzene. The photoalkylation of R'AcrH+ (R' = Me and De) also proceeds in acetonitrile and benzene using 4-tert-butyl-1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (Bu(t)BNAH) instead of R(4)Sn, yielding MeAcrHBu(t). The quantum yield determinations, the fluorescence quenching of R'AcrH+ by electron donors, and direct detection of the reaction intermediates by means of laser flash photolysis experiments indicate that the photoalkylation of R'AcrH+ in benzene as well as in acetonitrile proceeds via photoinduced electron transfer from the alkylating agents (R(4)Sn and Bu(t)BNAH) to the singlet excited states of R'AcrH+. The limiting quantum yields are determined by the competition between the back electron-transfer process and the bond-cleavage process in the radical pair produced by the photoinduced electron transfer. The rates of back electron transfer have been shown to be controlled by the solvent polarity which affects the solvent reorganization energy of the back electron transfer. When the free energy change of the back electron transfer (DeltaG(0)(bet)) in a polar solvent is in the Marcus inverted region, the rate of back electron transfer decreases with decreasing the solvent polarity, leading to the larger limiting quantum yield for the photoalkylation reaction. In contrast, the opposite trend is obtained when the DeltaG(0)(bet) value is in the normal region: the limiting quantum yield decreases with decreasing the solvent polarity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.