Abstract

Individual fish identification and recognition is an important step in the conservation and management of fisheries. One of most frequently used methods involves capturing and tagging fish. However, these processes have been reported to cause tissue damage, premature tag loss, and decreased swimming capacity. More recently, marine video recordings have been extensively used for monitoring fish populations. However, these require visual inspection to identify individual fish. In this work, we proposed an automatic method for the identification of individual brown trouts, Salmo trutta. We developed a deep convolutional architecture for this purpose. Specifically, given two fish images, multi-scale convolutional features were extracted to capture low-level features and high-level semantic components for embedding space representation. The extracted features were compared at each scale for capturing representation for individual fish identification. The method was evaluated on a dataset called NINA204 based on 204 videos of brown trout and on a dataset TROUT39 containing 39 brown trouts in 288 frames. The identification method distinguished individual fish with 94.6% precision and 74.3% recall on a NINA204 video sequence with significant appearance and shape variation. The identification method takes individual fish and is able to distinguish them with precision and recall percentages of 94.6% and 74.3% on NINA204 for a video sequence with significant appearance and shape variation.

Highlights

  • We presented the baseline results of the identification method on multiple experimental setups and compared them with histogram of oriented gradient (HOG) [47], rotation invariant local binary pattern (LBP) [48] feature-based methods

  • LBP features were computed with a radius of 3 at each pixel and the resulting texture image was represented with a histogram of 512 dimension

  • We developed a deep convolutional architecture for the identification of individual fish

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The adaption of technology in such areas is expanding as the use of video recording systems becomes widespread. Video recording has a number of advantages, such as being less labor intensive [2], capable of covering large areas of habitats, and it can be used in areas that are difficult to cover by other methods [3,4]. Video recordings have an advantage in that a viewer is able to pause, rewind, or forward the video, thereby increasing accuracy and precision [5]. The use of video methods has advantages over electrofishing, as this can cause injury or death to the fish [6] and has been shown to alter the reproductive behaviors of fish [7]. The use of video recordings has been applied over the world; examples include the Wenatchee

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call