Abstract
AbstractTwo catchments were used to test the hypothesis that using reactive phosphate rock (RPR), a low water soluble fertilizer, instead of superphosphate, could decrease phosphorus (P) export in streams. The sheep‐grazed catchments, each ca. 12 ha in size, received 20–25 kg P/ha either as RPR or superphosphate for 3 yr. Filterable (<0.45 μm) reactive P (FRP) and total P (TP) in stream samples were then compared against two subsequent years when both catchments received 20 kg P/ha as superphosphate. On average, during the 5‐yr study, loads of FRP and TP in stream flow were low (110 g FRP/ha and 358 g TP/ha), typical of dry sheep‐grazed hill country. However, FRP (58%) and TP (38%) in stream flow were significantly less when RPR was applied instead of superphosphate. Where appropriate climatic and soil conditions exist to maintain agronomic targets, RPR could be used to decrease P export in streams.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
