Abstract

Aim Several new bioactive compounds were recently introduced to the market with favorable ion release, tooth remineralization, and alkalizing potential. This study sought to compare the phosphate ion release and alkalizing potential of three bioactive materials in comparison with composite resin. Methods Thirty-six discs (2 × 6 mm) were fabricated from Fuji II LC resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI), Activa BioActive, Cention N, and Z250 composite in plastic molds. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 and 48 h and 6 months. Half of the specimens were used to assess the phosphate ion release while the other half were used to assess the alkalizing potential 1 h after pH drop from 6.8 to 4. Phosphate ion release was quantified by a spectrophotometer while the pH value was measured by a pH meter. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD test (for pairwise comparisons) at 0.05 level of significance. Results At 24 h, the maximum phosphate ion release in distilled water occurred in the Fuji II LC group followed by Cention N, Activa BioActive, and Z250. At 6 months, Cention N followed by Activa BioActive showed higher phosphate ion release than Fuji II LC and Z250. No significant difference was noted between Activa BioActive and Cention N at any time point. All materials, except for Z250, increased the pH of the environment. Fuji II LC had maximum alkalizing effect at all time points followed by Cention N and Activa BioActive. Conclusion Use of bioactive compounds is a promising method to ensure phosphate ion release, and can have a positive effect on tooth remineralization over time. Also, bioactive compounds can alkalize an acidic environment.

Highlights

  • Advances in dental material technology enabled the use of direct tooth-colored restorative materials for dental restorations [1]

  • Some reports are available regarding enhanced cariogenic biofilm growth next to composite restorations [2, 3]. ese parameters can increase the risk of bacterial microleakage at the tooth-composite interface and development of secondary caries, which is the main cause of failure of composite restorations [4]

  • A total of 36 discs measuring 6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were fabricated from each restorative material, Activa BioActive, Cention N, and Fuji II LC, Z250, using plastic molds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advances in dental material technology enabled the use of direct tooth-colored restorative materials for dental restorations [1]. Dental composites have been used for over 40 years for restoration of the lost tooth structure. They have no significant effect on the cariogenic bacteria and have no positive effect on the ionic balance of the adjacent tooth structure. Some reports are available regarding enhanced cariogenic biofilm growth next to composite restorations [2, 3]. Ese parameters can increase the risk of bacterial microleakage at the tooth-composite interface and development of secondary caries, which is the main cause of failure of composite restorations [4]. Another study reported a high rate of development of secondary caries around composite restorations, estimated at 60% [6]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call