Abstract

Understanding the referent of other’s utterance by referring the contextual information helps in smooth communication. Although this pragmatic referential process can be observed even in infants, its underlying mechanism and relative abilities remain unclear. This study aimed to comprehend the background of the referential process by investigating whether the phonological loop affected the referent assignment. A total of 76 children (43 girls) aged 3–5 years participated in a reference assignment task in which an experimenter asked them to answer explicit (e.g., “What color is this?”) and ambiguous (e.g., “What about this?”) questions about colorful objects. The phonological loop capacity was measured by using the forward digit span task in which children were required to repeat the numbers as an experimenter uttered them. The results showed that the scores of the forward digit span task positively predicted correct response to explicit questions and part of the ambiguous questions. That is, the phonological loop capacity did not have effects on referent assignment in response to ambiguous questions that were asked after a topic shift of the explicit questions and thus required a backward reference to the preceding explicit questions to detect the intent of the current ambiguous questions. These results suggest that although the phonological loop capacity could overtly enhance the storage of verbal information, it does not seem to directly contribute to the pragmatic referential process, which might require further social cognitive processes.

Highlights

  • Interpreting the referent of others’ communicative expressions is essential for smooth and efficient communication [1,2]

  • The results showed that the Phonological Loop Scores (PLSs) had significant positive effects on the explicit question (EQ) score (β = 0.409, z = 2.85, p = .004; likelihood ratio tests (LRTs); χ2 = 8.24, df = 6, p = .004), the ambiguous question (AQ) score (β = 0.414, z = 2.99, p = .003; LRT; χ2 = 9.4, df = 6, p = .002) and the EQ2 score (β = 0.259, z = 2.05, p = .041; LRT; χ2 = 4.12, df = 6, p = .042)

  • The current study aimed to further the knowledge of the background of the developing pragmatic referential capacity in children by investigating whether the phonological loop affected referent assignment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interpreting the referent of others’ communicative expressions is essential for smooth and efficient communication [1,2]. Once the talker has mentioned the topic of a second female person, we may interpret the referent of “she” as referring to the person who was mentioned immediately before it. This flexible pragmatic reference assignment process concerns drawing reasonable or appropriate context-independent meaning of an arbitrary utterance, occurs when the referent has appeared at an earlier point in the sequence, and requires interpretation through the preceding context on the basis of the common experience between the participants of communication [5,6]. The cognitive components underlying the referent assignment process as well as its development are not well understood

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call