Abstract
A previous paper (Locke & Fehr, in press a) reported analyses of EMG recordings from a chin-lip sire of 24 adults during their perception and rehearsal of word lists, with the general finding that lip activity was substantially greater when Ss processed lip-articulated compared to nonlabial words. This paper reports a subsequent analysis of phonetic activity during Ss' recall of the word lists, which was effected orally or graphically, with the finding that Ss' written reports were accompanied by as much motor-phonetic activity as spoken recall. The primary difference between overt and covert forms of speech appears not to lie in the nature of labial-nonlabial tracing relationships but in the absolute magnitude of EMG values.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
