Abstract
The seeming corpulent connection between theory and practice informs this inquiry. Whereas there have been claims from several quarters that the decline in the quality of pedagogy lies with poor theory but where there is a sound one, its deleterious practice or application is considered a foremost culprit. Consequent upon this, this research takes a twist on this issue. Through the method of critical analysis and interpretation, the study employs the Marxist theory of education as its theoretical framework. In other words, the paper takes its cue from a Marxist perspective to posit that the society is a battle ground of ideologies. What is perceived as failed theory and/or practice in pedagogy is actually the fulfillment of an ideology of the ruling class who are not only the ruling material force but also the society’s ruling intellectual force. This clearly portends that there is an ideology behind any curriculum and its application. It is always a curriculum put in place by the ruling class. It is calculated to produce minds that would condone and uphold the hegemonic status quo of the ruling intellectual force. It therefore does not matter whether or not society develops. For development is defined by the prevailing ideology. Contrary opinions are repressed and exterminated usually through force or rhetoric. If this is the case, the question of theory and practice in pedagogy does not arise. On the contrary, the main impetus ought to be how to deal with what kind of ideology persists in a society’s educational curriculum. Hence, the current study proposes a re-thinking away from the perceived and seemingly wide abyss between theory and practice. This is because every fact and practice is theory-laden. It is the submission of this paper that the ideological basis of a curriculum demands more attention.
Highlights
In this study, the role of the curriculum and the kind of society as well as the individuals that live in the society would be exposed from a Marxist perspective as an ideological goal
This is in line with the assertion that the class which is the ruling material force of a society is at the same time its ruling intellectual force
Responding to the foregoing posers, this study proposes that the gap between theory and practice in the educational curriculum is a product of the society, the ruling intellectual force
Summary
The role of the curriculum and the kind of society as well as the individuals that live in the society would be exposed from a Marxist perspective as an ideological goal. Given the belief that education is a form of transmission of ideas, Harris wants us to believe that there is a manipulation that is in play focused to pull down any attempts for one person to think outside the box He concludes his thoughts on ideology and education by stating that: It should go without saying that education in a capitalist liberal democracy does present a way of seeing the world that is distortive, misrepresentative, and against the best interests of the educands. It is much like living under the influence of a perception-altering drug; or viewing the world from the perspective of a degenerate research programme (living in the twentieth century but still seeing the world in terms of Aristotelian cosmology); or being under the influence of distortive class interest-serving ideology (Harris, 1988:108) It is not incorrect from the foregoing that there are two plausible reasons why one would want to promote a curriculum with an ideology that leads to false consciousness. There is nothing to be bridged until one realizes that the ideological underpinning of a curriculum plays a crucial role in social ordering and the intellectual production capacity of the state
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.