Philosophical Intuitions and Psychological Theory

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessPhilosophical Intuitions and Psychological Theory*Tamara Horowitz Tamara Horowitz Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 108, Number 2January 1998 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/233809 Views: 146Total views on this site Citations: 19Citations are reported from Crossref © 1998 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Paul Rehren, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong How Stable are Moral Judgments?, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 31 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00649-7Shang Long Yeo A Bayesian analysis of debunking arguments in ethics, Philosophical Studies 179, no.55 (Aug 2021): 1673–1692.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01721-1Sergiu Buscaneanu Tertium datur: Multi-attribute reference points and integration choices between the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23, no.44 (Dec 2020): 627–644.https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120974012Shang Long Yeo Defusing the Regress Challenge to Debunking Arguments, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, no.66 (Aug 2020): 785–800.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.31Ruth Weintraub Peer disagreement and counter-examples, Philosophical Studies 177, no.77 (Mar 2019): 1773–1790.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01284-2Tomasz Żuradzki The Normative Significance of Empirical Moral Psychology, Diametros 17, no.6464 (Jun 2020): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1626Alex Voorhoeve, Arnaldur Stefánsson, Brian Wallace Similarity and the trustworthiness of distributive judgements, Economics and Philosophy 35, no.33 (Dec 2018): 537–561.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000457Sandra Dreisbach, Daniel Guevara The Asian Disease Problem and the Ethical Implications Of Prospect Theory, Noûs 53, no.33 (Sep 2017): 613–638.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12227Camilla Colombo Doing, Allowing, Gains, and Losses, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.55 (Nov 2018): 1107–1118.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9949-8MICHAEL NEUMANN Testing Rationality, Dialogue 57, no.0303 (Mar 2018): 615–631.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217318000094Margherita Arcangeli Thought Experiments in Model-Based Reasoning, (Jan 2017): 463–493.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_21Regina A. Rini Debunking debunking: a regress challenge for psychological threats to moral judgment, Philosophical Studies 173, no.33 (Jul 2015): 675–697.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0513-2Joanna Demaree-Cotton Do framing effects make moral intuitions unreliable?, Philosophical Psychology 29, no.11 (Dec 2014): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.989967Regina A. Rini Psychology and the Aims of Normative Ethics, (Sep 2014): 149–168.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_162Regina A. Rini Making Psychology Normatively Significant, The Journal of Ethics 17, no.33 (May 2013): 257–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-013-9145-yAlex Barber Hedonism and the Experience Machine, Philosophical Papers 40, no.22 (Jul 2011): 257–278.https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2011.591850Neil LEVY, Yasuko KITANO We're All Folk: An Interview with Neil Levy about Experimental Philosophy and Conceptual Analysis, Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 19, no.00 (Jan 2011): 87–98.https://doi.org/10.4288/jafpos.19.0_87Felipe De Brigard If you like it, does it matter if it's real?, Philosophical Psychology 23, no.11 (Feb 2010): 43–57.https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903532290Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell Human Nature and the Best Consequentialist Moral System, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.304384