Abstract

After on overview of Origen’s relations to Rabbinic exegesis, I turn to the relations between Origen and Hellenistic Judaism. I investigate how Philo and Origen use the instrument of allegory to read the Bible in the light of philosophy, but both of them react against a sheer allegorization of Scripture, which existed both in the Jewish allegorizers who preceded Philo and in ‘Gnostic’ Christian allegorizers. Even Philo and Origen, however, thought (unlike subsequent Rabbinic and Christian exegetes) that the Genesis account of creation had a special status and required to be interpreted not literally, but only allegorically. I argue for a Platonic influence on this conception and point out how Origen emphasized the Jewish antecedents to his own philosophical allegoresis of Scripture. For Origen, Philo the Jew was a much better exegete and theologian than the Christian “heretics” were.

Highlights

  • I am going to focus on the relations between Origen of Alexandria († 255 ca.), the great and extremely learned Christian exegete, theologian, and philosopher, and Judaism as regards Biblical exegesis

  • I will argue for a Platonic influence on this conception and point out how Origen emphasized the Jewish antecedents to his own philosophical allegoresis of Scripture

  • Isaac’s willingness to be offered in sacrifice and the redemptive character of his sacrifice in Rabbinic exegesis resemble very closely the Christological interpretation of that episode by the early Christian exegetes, in whose view Isaac is the typos of Christ

Read more

Summary

Introduction

I am going to focus on the relations between Origen of Alexandria († 255 ca.), the great and extremely learned Christian exegete, theologian, and philosopher, and Judaism as regards Biblical exegesis.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call