Abstract
Interspecific threat-sensitivity allows prey to maximize the net benefit of antipredator strategies by adjusting the type and intensity of their response to the level of predation risk. This is well documented for classical prey-predator interactions but less so for intraguild predation (IGP). We examined threat-sensitivity in antipredator behaviour of larvae in a predatory mite guild sharing spider mites as prey. The guild consisted of the highly vulnerable intraguild (IG) prey and weak IG predator Phytoseiulus persimilis, the moderately vulnerable IG prey and moderate IG predator Neoseiulus californicus and the little vulnerable IG prey and strong IG predator Amblyseius andersoni. We videotaped the behaviour of the IG prey larvae of the three species in presence of either a low- or a high-risk IG predator female or predator absence and analysed time, distance, path shape and interaction parameters of predators and prey. The least vulnerable IG prey A. andersoni was insensitive to differing IGP risks but the moderately vulnerable IG prey N. californicus and the highly vulnerable IG prey P. persimilis responded in a threat-sensitive manner. Predator presence triggered threat-sensitive behavioural changes in one out of ten measured traits in N. californicus larvae but in four traits in P. persimilis larvae. Low-risk IG predator presence induced a typical escape response in P. persimilis larvae, whereas they reduced their activity in the high-risk IG predator presence. We argue that interspecific threat-sensitivity may promote co-existence of IG predators and IG prey and should be common in predator guilds with long co-evolutionary history.
Highlights
Intraguild predation (IGP), the killing of food competitors, is a widespread phenomenon in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Polis et al 1989; Arim and Marquet 2004; SergioExp Appl Acarol (2013) 60:95–115 and Hiraldo 2008; Irigoien and de Roos 2011)
The least vulnerable IG prey decreased over time (IG prey) A. andersoni was insensitive to differing intraguild predation (IGP) risks but the moderately vulnerable IG prey N. californicus and the highly vulnerable IG prey P. persimilis responded in a threat-sensitive manner
To obtain aged IG prey eggs giving rise to larvae used in experiments, gravid A. andersoni, N. californicus or P. persimilis females were randomly withdrawn from the rearing units and placed on detached bean leaves with surplus spider mite prey
Summary
Intraguild predation (IGP), the killing of food competitors, is a widespread phenomenon in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems (Polis et al 1989; Arim and Marquet 2004; SergioExp Appl Acarol (2013) 60:95–115 and Hiraldo 2008; Irigoien and de Roos 2011). The occurrence and intensity of IGP commonly depend on the involved life stages (Polis et al 1989) with individual guild members often reversing roles during ontogeny, from juvenile intraguild (IG) prey to adult IG predators (e.g., Magalhaes et al 2005; Montserrat et al 2011). Many IG prey species co-occur with multiple IG predator species posing different risks, ranging from insignificant to high IGP risk [mammalian carnivores (Schaller 1972; Hunter and Caro 2008; Glen et al 2011); raptors (Lourenco et al 2011); predatory insects (Rosenheim et al 1993; Wissinger and McGrady 1993); mites (Walzer and Schausberger 2011a); tadpoles (Hawley 2009); salamander larvae (Gustafson 1993)]. Analogous to classical predation, to optimally balance the trade-offs between anti-IG predator behaviours and other fitness related activities such as foraging and mating, selection should favour IG prey, which is able to respond in an interspecific threat-sensitive manner to varying IGP risks (Walzer and Schausberger 2011a; Sih 1982; Helfman 1989)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.