Abstract

BackgroundBeckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is primarily caused by epigenetic errors. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the epigenetic errors and phenotypes of BWS and to evaluate the efficacy of diagnosing BWS using patients’ clinical characteristics.MethodsPatients clinically diagnosed with BWS were subjected to methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) for (epi)genotyping. The patients’ clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared using regression models. The diagnostic efficacy of previous criteria and scoring systems was compared using area under the receiving operating curve (ROC).ResultsThe most common clinical features observed in BWS patients were macroglossia (83.2%), abdominal wall defects (71.3%), and ear creases/pits (55.3%). Patients with the loss of methylation at imprinting control 2 (IC2-LOM) and gaining of methylation at imprinting control 1 (IC1-GOM) subtypes had significantly higher frequencies of ear creases/pits and facial nevus flammeus, and visceromegaly, respectively. Paternal uniparental isodisomy (pUPD) was characterized by significantly less macroglossia but more hemihypertrophy. The area under the curve (AUC) was comparably good in both recently developed scoring systems (0.87 for Ibrahim and 0.82 for Brioude.) and in the scoring system developed using the current cohort (0.88).ConclusionsThis study, which is the largest cohort study of BWS cases in China published to date, confirmed the diagnostic efficacy of a recently developed symptom-based BWS scoring system in a Chinese population. Significant differences exist between the phenotypes of BWS epigenetic subtypes; however, the pattern is similar between Asian and European populations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call