Abstract
Phenomenography and the representation of conceptual uncertainty: A comment on Moffitt
Highlights
Earlier on I accepted the invitation by the journal editors of Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning (STEL) to review Philip Moffitt’s paper “Engineering academics and technology enhanced learning; A phenomenographic approach to establish conceptions of scholarly interactions with theory”
Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) in Higher Education (HE) is an area of specialisation I have long been interested in, and increasingly so because of my new work remit in that direction
I would like to make a few comments about representation of concepts, dealing with uncertainty, and the relevance of those topics for academic development
Summary
Phenomenography and the representation of conceptual uncertainty: A FRPPHQWRQ0RIƚWW Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 261-265. Earlier on I accepted the invitation by the journal editors of Studies in Technology Enhanced Learning (STEL) to review Philip Moffitt’s paper “Engineering academics and technology enhanced learning; A phenomenographic approach to establish conceptions of scholarly interactions with theory”.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
