Abstract

Double-beta decay is presently a very studied process both theoretically and experimentally3 due to its potential to provide valuable information about important, but still unknown issues rela-4 ted to the neutrino properties and conservation of some symmetries. In the theoretical study of5 the double-beta decay two key quantities entering the half-life formulas are important, namely6 the phase space factors embedding the influence of the Coulomb field of the daughter nucleus7 on the emitted electrons/positrons, and the nuclearmatrix elements embedding the nuclearstru-8 cture effects of the nuclei participating in the decay. Accurate calculation of both of them are9 needed for good predictions of the double-beta decay half-lives and transitions still unmeasured,10 and for constraining various beyond Standard Model parameters associated with mechanisms11 that may contribute to the neutrinoless double-beta decay modes. During time much attention12 has been paid to the nuclear matrix elements that were considered to bring the largest uncer-13 tainties in the computation of the double-beta decay half-lives, while the phase space factors14 were considered until the recent past to be computed with enough precision. However, newer15 computation of the phase space factors performed with more precise methods revealed relevant16 deviations from their values reported previously, especially for heavier nuclei and for positron17 emitting and electron capture decay modes. In this paper we review the progress made in the18 computation of the phase space factors for double beta decay. We begin with the non-relativistic19 approaches, continue with the relativistic approaches which use approximate electron/positron20 wave functions, and end up with recent, more precise, computations of the phase space factors21 where exact electron wave functions are obtained from the resolution of a Dirac equation in a22 Coulomb-type potential and with inclusion of finite nuclear size and screening effects. We report23 an up-dated and complete list of the phase space factors (PSF) for the following DBD modes:24 β−β−, β+β+, ECβ+ and ECEC and for transitions to final ground and first excited 2+ and 0+25 statesofthedaughternuclei. Wealsomakeacomparisonbetweendifferentvaluesofthephase26 space factors found in literature and discuss the differences between these results.

Highlights

  • Nuclear double beta decay (DBD) is the process with the longest lifetime measured so far, by which an even-even nucleus decays naturally into another even-even nucleus with the same atomic mass A but with the electric charge changed by two units

  • The DBD modes can be classified according to the number and type of the released leptons, and can be divided in two categories: 1) Decays occurring with LNC 1a) Two neutrino double-electron decay (2νβ−β−)

  • The phase space factors (PSF) values reported by KI in Kotila and Iachello [11], Kotila and Iachello [12], Stoica and Mirea [13] are obtained with a similar approach as ours, namely, the use of exact electron wave functions obtained by solving numerically the Dirac equation and with inclusion of the finite nuclear size and electron screening effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nuclear double beta decay (DBD) is the process with the longest lifetime measured so far, by which an even-even nucleus decays naturally into another even-even nucleus with the same atomic mass A but with the electric charge changed by two units. Within the Standard Model (SM) it can occur through several decay modes with lepton number conservation, namely with the emission of two electrons/positrons and two neutrinos/antineutrinos. Theories beyond SM predict that this process may occur without emission of neutrinos/anti-neutrinos, namely with lepton number violation (LNV) by two units, and these decay modes are generically called neutrinoless doublebeta decays. The DBD modes can be classified according to the number and type of the released leptons, and can be divided in two categories: 1) Decays occurring with LNC 1a) Two neutrino double-electron decay (2νβ−β−). 1c) Two neutrino electron capture (EC) positron emitting decay (2νECβ+). 1d) Two neutrino double electron capture decay (2νECEC). 2) Decays occurring with LNV by two units 2a) Neutrinoless double-electron decay (0νβ−β−).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call