Abstract

This paper describes a new means for evaluating the quality of crystallographic electron density maps. It has been found that a better data set possesses greater robustness against perturbations applied to the phases. Thus it allows recognition of a more precise phase set and provides a way to select the best or reject the worst from several noisy data sets derived from the same crystal structure. The results indicate that calculation of the correlations by the procedure described here can be useful in ranking electron density maps in this aspect of quality. The method suggested has potential use for selecting a better molecular replacement solution, as well as for evaluating trial phase sets inab initiophasing procedures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call