Abstract

BackgroundTraditionally, vaccine development against the blood-stage of Plasmodium falciparum infection has focused on recombinant protein-adjuvant formulations in order to induce high-titer growth-inhibitory antibody responses. However, to date no such vaccine encoding a blood-stage antigen(s) alone has induced significant protective efficacy against erythrocytic-stage infection in a pre-specified primary endpoint of a Phase IIa/b clinical trial designed to assess vaccine efficacy. Cell-mediated responses, acting in conjunction with functional antibodies, may be necessary for immunity against blood-stage P. falciparum. The development of a vaccine that could induce both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses would enable important proof-of-concept efficacy studies to be undertaken to address this question.MethodologyWe conducted a Phase Ia, non-randomized clinical trial in 16 healthy, malaria-naïve adults of the chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) replication-deficient viral vectored vaccines encoding two alleles (3D7 and FVO) of the P. falciparum blood-stage malaria antigen; apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1). ChAd63-MVA AMA1 administered in a heterologous prime-boost regime was shown to be safe and immunogenic, inducing high-level T cell responses to both alleles 3D7 (median 2036 SFU/million PBMC) and FVO (median 1539 SFU/million PBMC), with a mixed CD4+/CD8+ phenotype, as well as substantial AMA1-specific serum IgG responses (medians of 49 µg/mL and 41 µg/mL for 3D7 and FVO AMA1 respectively) that demonstrated growth inhibitory activity in vitro.ConclusionsChAd63-MVA is a safe and highly immunogenic delivery platform for both alleles of the AMA1 antigen in humans which warrants further efficacy testing. ChAd63-MVA is a promising heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategy that could be applied to numerous other diseases where strong cellular and humoral immune responses are required for protection.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01095055

Highlights

  • An effective vaccine against the blood-stage of Plasmodium falciparum infection could significantly contribute to any future strategy for reducing malaria morbidity and mortality, limiting transmission and aiding disease eradication [1]

  • chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63)-modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) is a promising heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategy that could be applied to numerous other diseases where strong cellular and humoral immune responses are required for protection

  • Despite these extensive efforts to date, no candidate blood-stage vaccine has been developed that has demonstrated statistically significant efficacy with regard to clinical outcome in a pre-specified primary endpoint analysis in a Phase IIa/b clinical trial designed to assess vaccine efficacy [3,8]. The majority of such blood-stage vaccine candidates have traditionally focused on recombinant protein-inadjuvant formulations with the aim of inducing growth inhibitory antibody responses against merozoite antigens involved in the erythrocyte invasion process [3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An effective vaccine against the blood-stage of Plasmodium falciparum infection could significantly contribute to any future strategy for reducing malaria morbidity and mortality, limiting transmission and aiding disease eradication [1]. Significant strainspecific efficacy was recently reported in a pre-specified secondary analysis of a Phase IIb trial of a mono-valent 3D7 strain apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) protein vaccine [6] Of note, this vaccine showed an encouraging signal in a prior Phase IIa controlled human malaria infection study [7]. This vaccine showed an encouraging signal in a prior Phase IIa controlled human malaria infection study [7] Despite these extensive efforts to date, no candidate blood-stage vaccine has been developed that has demonstrated statistically significant efficacy with regard to clinical outcome in a pre-specified primary endpoint analysis in a Phase IIa/b clinical trial designed to assess vaccine efficacy [3,8].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call