Abstract

The phase stability at high temperatures in nanograined Fe–Ni alloy prepared by surface mechanical attrition treatment (SMAT) and ball milling (BM) modes are drastically different. For example, the onset temperature (As) of reverse martensitic transformation (RMT) of nanocrystal prepared by SMAT is higher than that of coarse crystal, while BM exhibits the opposite result. The elastoplastic phase field model for RMT was first proposed to investigate the correlation between RMT and its forward martensitic transformation (FMT), in turn, the above experimental phenomena were revealed in this paper. The prepared nanocrystals with the same diameter (15 nm) by SMAT and BM mode were taken as representative examples. The simulation results indicated that the strain energy is relaxed by the applied strain during FMT in nanocrystalline prepared by smaller plastic deformation mode (e.g. SMAT), but it is enhanced by larger plastic deformation mode (e.g. BM). The stored strain energy in BM mode is much larger than that in SMAT mode, and hence the driving force provided for subsequent RMT is also larger in BM mode. Therefore, the phase stability of the martensitic nanocrystals prepared by BM mode at high temperatures is much lower than the counterpart by SMAT mode, which agrees well with the experimental measurements.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call