Abstract

AbstractIn the recent years phase‐field modeling of fracture has become a promising tool to describe complex crack patterns in all kinds of solid materials. Many of the models assume an isotropic material behavior, which of course is not a meaningful assumption for e.g. biological tissues such as arterial walls. Since the phase‐field approach introduces an additional (smeared) phase describing the evolution of the crack, this method is well suited to be extended to anisotropic materials without thinking about an adaption of the discretization technique. Anisotropy can be incorporated in several ways, like by an extension of the surface energy, i.e. by making the energy release rate orientation dependent, as considered in [1]. Our ansatz is based on a pure geometrical approach, namely on an anisotropic formulation of the crack surface itself. Here, we will focus on transversely isotropic and cubically anisotropic solids, where the latter one makes the incorporation of the second gradient of the crack phase field necessary. At the end one numerical example is shown, which conceptually shows the influence of the anisotropy on the crack path. (© 2015 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call