Abstract

PurposeVolume flow rate (VFR) measurements based on phase contrast (PC)-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets have spatially varying bias due to eddy current induced phase errors. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of phase errors in time averaged PC-MR imaging of the cerebral vasculature and explore the effects of three common correction schemes (local bias correction (LBC), local polynomial correction (LPC), and whole brain polynomial correction (WBPC)).MethodsMeasurements of the eddy current induced phase error from a static phantom were first obtained. In thirty healthy human subjects, the methods were then assessed in background tissue to determine if local phase offsets could be removed. Finally, the techniques were used to correct VFR measurements in cerebral vessels and compared statistically.ResultsIn the phantom, phase error was measured to be <2.1 ml/s per pixel and the bias was reduced with the correction schemes. In background tissue, the bias was significantly reduced, by 65.6% (LBC), 58.4% (LPC) and 47.7% (WBPC) (p < 0.001 across all schemes). Correction did not lead to significantly different VFR measurements in the vessels (p = 0.997). In the vessel measurements, the three correction schemes led to flow measurement differences of -0.04 ± 0.05 ml/s, 0.09 ± 0.16 ml/s, and -0.02 ± 0.06 ml/s. Although there was an improvement in background measurements with correction, there was no statistical difference between the three correction schemes (p = 0.242 in background and p = 0.738 in vessels).ConclusionsWhile eddy current induced phase errors can vary between hardware and sequence configurations, our results showed that the impact is small in a typical brain PC-MR protocol and does not have a significant effect on VFR measurements in cerebral vessels.

Highlights

  • Phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a powerful method for measuring blood flow velocity in human subjects and can provide key hemodynamic information about the vasculature

  • The bias was significantly reduced, by 65.6% (LBC), 58.4% (LPC) and 47.7% (WBPC) (p < 0.001 across all schemes)

  • Correction did not lead to significantly different Volume flow rate (VFR) measurements in the vessels (p = 0.997)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a powerful method for measuring blood flow velocity in human subjects and can provide key hemodynamic information about the vasculature. Concern has been raised about measurement accuracy [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], in particular, the impact of phase error from the application of magnetic gradient fields causing a spatially varying offset in the phase across the image [2, 3, 8, 10,11,12, 14] This bias can limit the accuracy of quantitative PC-MR measurements. It has been suggested that phase-error correction schemes may introduce additional error in the measurements [17]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call