Abstract

AbstractIn contrast to low‐Teclogites (garnet growth zoning preserved) or high‐Teclogites (garnet diffusionally homogenized at peak conditions), medium‐temperature eclogites pose additional challenges toP–Tdeterminations due to the partial preservation of garnet zoning. The Dulan area, in the southeastern part of North Qaidam ultrahigh‐pressure terrane, exposes minor eclogites hosted by ortho‐ and paragneisses. Four fresh, medium‐temperature eclogites contain the paragenesis Grt+Omp+Rt+Qz/Coe+Ph±Ky±Zo. In all samples, garnetXMgshows little zoning, suggesting diffusional modification, and precludes the use of pyrope+almandine+grossular isopleth intersections to determine aP–Tpath. However, in one sample, sharp zoning in grossular content suggests that grossular growth compositions are preserved. Since garnet pyrope+almandine compositions appear to be modified, we instead use the intersections of grossular and garnet volume isopleths to define a progradeP–Tpath. This approach yields a path from ~17 kbar and ~410°C to ~35 kbar and ~625°C with a gradient of ~5–9°C/km through the lawsonite stability field. PeakP–Tconditions determined from the intersection between Si pfu in phengite and Zr‐in‐rutile isopleths are ~26–33 kbar and ~625–700 °C for the four eclogites. These conditions are close to the limit of the lawsonite stability field, suggesting that fluid released from lawsonite breakdown may have promoted re‐equilibration at these conditions. These peak conditions are also in good agreement (within 3 kbar and 50°C) with garnet–omphacite–phengite (±kyanite) thermobarometry in three of the four samples. We regard the phengite–rutile constraints as more reliable, because they are less sensitive to uncertainties associated with ferric iron compared to conventional thermobarometry. Phase equilibrium modelling predicts that the retrograde assemblage of amphibole+zoisite formed at ~60 km. Infiltration of external fluids was likely required for the growth of these hydrous minerals. Based on the comparison ofP–Testimation methods applied in this study, we propose that the garnet grossular+volume isopleths can recover the progradeP–Tpath of medium‐temperature eclogites, and that the combination of phengite+rutile isopleths represents a more robust approach to constrain peakP–Tconditions.

Highlights

  • Ultrahigh‐pressure (UHP) eclogites are products of subduction to mantle depths (Chopin, 2003; Gilotti, 2013)

  • We evaluate and discuss the applicability of phase equilibrium modelling, conventional thermobarometry, and Zr‐in‐rutile thermometry to medium‐ temperature eclogites (MT)–UHP eclogites

  • In order to understand the metamorphic evolution of eclogites from the Dulan area, phase equilibrium modelling was coupled with Zr‐in‐rutile thermometry and conventional thermobarometry

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Ultrahigh‐pressure (UHP) eclogites are products of subduction to mantle depths (Chopin, 2003; Gilotti, 2013). The North Qaidam UHP terrane, in China, represents an early Palaeozoic continental suture zone (Figure 1a; Zhang, Yu, & Mattinson, 2017). The Dulan area is located in the southeastern part of the North Qaidam UHP terrane (Figure 1a,b) This area is dominated by paragneisses, pelitic schists, and orthogneisses, with minor eclogites and ultramafic rocks (Mattinson et al, 2007; Song et al, 2003). Conventional garnet+omphacite+phengite±kyanite thermobarometry of eclogites records peak P–T conditions of ~27– 35 kbar and ~610–830°C (Ren et al, 2016; Song et al, 2003, 2006, 2014; Zhang, Mattinson, et al, 2010; Zhang, Meng, et al, 2009; Zhang, Zhang, 2009), and zircon U–Pb ages are c. Ages from HP granulites are c. 435–410 Ma, and overlap with the ages of eclogite facies metamorphism (Yu et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2015)

| Analytical methods
| Results
| Methods
22 Amp vol
CONCLUSIONS
16 Chl Lws
D197 2 D205 3 D167 4 D161B
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call