Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can entrain ongoing brain oscillations and modulate the motor system in a frequency-dependent manner. Recent animal studies have demonstrated that the phase of a sinusoidal current also has an important role in modulation of neuronal activity. However, the phase effects of tACS on the human motor system are largely unknown. Here, we systematically investigated the effects of tACS phase and frequency on the primary motor cortex (M1) by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). First, we compared the phase effects (90°, 180°, 270° or 360°) of 10 and 20 Hz tACS on MEPs. The 20 Hz tACS significantly increased M1 excitability compared with the 10 Hz tACS at 90° phase only. Second, we studied the 90° phase effect on MEPs at different tACS frequencies (5, 10, 20 or 40 Hz). The 20 vs. 10 Hz difference was again observed, but the 90° phase in 5 and 40 Hz tACS did not influence M1 excitability. Third, the 90° phase effects of 10 and 20 Hz tACS were compared with sham stimulation. The 90° phase of 20 Hz tACS enhanced MEP amplitudes compared with sham stimulation, but there was no significant effect of 10 Hz tACS. Taken together, we assume that the differential 90° phase effects on 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS can be attributed to the neural synchronization modulated by tACS. Our results further underline that phase and frequency are the important factors in the effects of tACS on M1 excitability.

Highlights

  • Rhythmic brain activity is generated by neuronal elements or networks of different spatial scales [1]

  • The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) amplitudes tended to increase for 20 Hz Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) but to decrease for 10 Hz tACS when they were recorded at 90° phase

  • Our results clearly demonstrated that frequency and tACS phase is important for the effects of tACS on M1 excitability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rhythmic brain activity is generated by neuronal elements or networks of different spatial scales [1]. Regional oscillatory activities of specific frequencies are related to distinct brain functions [2]. Spontaneous oscillations such as α (8–13 Hz) and β (14–30 Hz) frequency bands are observed in the sensorimotor area. Corticomuscular synchronization has been shown in the α and β range during isometric muscle contraction [7,8,9] and slow finger movement [10], respectively.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call