Abstract
An improved method for estimation of causal effects from observational data is demonstrated. Applications in medicine have been few, and the purpose of the present study is to contribute new clinical insight by means of this new and more sophisticated analysis. Long term effect of medication for adult ADHD patients is not resolved. A model with causal parameters to represent effect of medication was formulated, which accounts for time-varying confounding and selection-bias from loss to follow-up. The popular marginal structural model (MSM) for causal inference, of Robins et al., adjusts for time-varying confounding, but suffers from lack of robustness for misspecification in the weights. Recent work by Imai and Ratkovic [1][2] achieves robustness in the MSM, through improved covariate balance (CBMSM). The CBMSM (freely available software) was compared with a standard fit of a MSM and a naive regression model, to give a robust estimate of the true treatment effect in 250 previously non-medicated adults, treated for one year, in a specialized ADHD outpatient clinic in Norway. Covariate balance was greatly improved, resulting in a stronger treatment effect than without this improvement. In terms of treatment effect per week, early stages seemed to have the strongest influence. An estimated average reduction of 4 units on the symptom scale assessed at 12 weeks, for hypothetical medication in the 9 - 12 weeks period compared to no medication in this period, was found. The treatment effect persisted throughout the whole year, with an estimated average reduction of 0.7 units per week on symptoms assessed at one year, for hypothetical medication in the last 13 weeks of the year, compared to no medication in this period. The present findings support a strong and causal direct and indirect effect of pharmacological treatment of adults with ADHD on improvement in symptoms, and with a stronger treatment effect than has been reported.
Highlights
Estimation of causal treatment effects from observational studies has obvious limitations and challenges
The results show serious underestimation with this approach, with 37% and 53% relative bias for the 19 - 39 weeks, and 39 - 52 weeks periods, respectively
A marginal structural model (MSM) (GLM weights) was fitted, to account for time-varying confounding and selection bias, but with covariate balance that was greatly improved with the covariate balanced MSM (CBMSM)
Summary
Estimation of causal treatment effects from observational studies has obvious limitations and challenges. If a scientific question of interest really is a causal one, the analysis should target the specific question, even if the price is strong assumptions. A scientist would more relate to subject specific assumptions, than an association with few assumptions and no causal statement, which can be misleading (in both magnitude and direction). Short term effect of medication for treatment of ADHD is well documented [3] [4] [5] [6]. Questions about long-term effects are less resolved, and more long-term prospective studies on treatment of adult ADHD patients with no prior medication, in a practical clinical setting are warranted [7]. High drop-out rate and limited reports on side-effects characterizes the few that have been conducted [8] [9]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
