Pharmacological Responses of Rabbit Urinary Bladder after Subtotal Cystectomy

Abstract

Partial cystectomy is used clinically in specific circumstances. There have been some reports indicating that the bladder following subtotal cystectomy can regenerate to a certain degree. The present study investigates the physiology and pharmacology of bladder regeneration at eight weeks after resection of a major part of the bladder body in rabbits. The following studies were performed on control and cystectomy bladders: 1) in vivo cystometry (prior to and four weeks after the operation, and before the sacrifice at eight weeks); 2) sequential muscle strip study (the strips were obtained by dividing bladder transversely into upper body, lower body, mid-bladder, upper base and lower base); and 3) in vitro whole bladder studies. The results can be summarized as follows: 1) grossly there was no regeneration of the bladder body; the cystometric capacity was increased slowly after the operation primarily due to increased size and capacity of the bladder base. 2) The contractile response of the subtotal cystectomized bladder body to field stimulation and bethanechol stimulation was less than the response of normal bladder body. 3) The contractile response to epinephrine showed that the ratio of alpha/beta adrenergic response was much greater in the cystectomy bladder than in the normal bladder. 4) In the whole bladder study, the intravesical pressure response to field stimulation was about the same in both groups, the response to bethanechol was less for cystectomized bladder, and the response to methoxamine was greater for the cystectomized bladder. 5) The ability of cystectomy bladder to empty in response to both field stimulation and bethanechol was impaired whereas the control bladder fully emptied to both field stimulation and bethanechol.In conclusion, over the eight week period following subtotal cystectomy the capacity increased via distention (and hypertrophy) of the bladder base area as opposed to regeneration of the bladder body. (J. Urol., 142: 409-412, 1989)