Abstract

Objective: Resistant hypertension is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and mortality. Yet, its management is still challenging. This study aims to establish the comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic and interventional treatments by conducting a network meta-analysis. Design and method: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Web of Science Core Collection in March 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing treatment options as add-on therapy for management of resistant hypertension were included. Outcomes were blood pressure changes, measured in the office and in 24h ABPM. We applied a frequentist random effects model to perform a network meta-analysis combining placebo medication and sham procedure as the reference comparator. Results: From 4771 records, 24 studies met our inclusion criteria with 3458 included patients in total. 12 active treatment alternatives were analyzed. Among all comparators, spironolactone had the highest-ranking probability and was considered as the most effective treatment to reduce office systolic blood pressure (-13.30 mmHg [-17.89; -8.72]; P < 0.0001) and 24h systolic blood pressure (-8.46 mmHg [-12.54; -4.38]; P < 0.0001) in patients with resistant hypertension. Conclusions: Among all pharmacologic and interventional treatments, spironolactone has been found to be most effective in reducing office and 24h systolic blood pressure as an add-on therapy for resistant hypertension. Our study provides an evidence-based and valid reference in clinical decision-making.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.