Abstract

To compare the pharmacokinetic properties of two newly developed generic ambroxol formulations with a branded innovator product in healthy Chinese male volunteers. This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, three-period crossover study in healthy volunteers aged 18 - 45 years under fasting conditions. Subjects were assigned to receive 1 of 2 test formulations or a reference tablet of ambroxol 30 mg. Each study period was separated by a 1-week washout phase. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified times. A non-compartmental method was employed to determine pharmacokinetic properties (C(max), t(max), AUC(0-tlast), AUC(0-∞)) to test for bioequivalence. The predetermined regulatory range of 90% CI for bioequivalence was 80 - 125%. 24 subjects were enrolled in and completed the study. The geometric mean C(max) values for the test tablet, test capsule, and reference product were 82.73, 85.36, 84.56 ng/mL, and their geometric mean AUC(0-tlast) (AUC(0-∞)) were 660.87 (753.49), 678.98 (756.79), and 639.41 (712.14) ng x h/mL, respectively. For test tablet vs. reference, the 90% CIs of the least squares mean test/reference ratios of C(max), AUC(0-tlast), and AUC(0-∞) were 91.2% to 104.9%, 96.5% to 110.7%, and 98.8% to 113.4%, respectively. For test capsule, the corresponding values were 94.1% to 108.3%, 99.2% to 113.7%, and 99.2% to 113.9%, respectively. No adverse events occurred during the study. The ambroxol 30 mg tablets and capsules were considered bioequivalent to the reference formulation in accordance with predetermined regulatory criteria.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call