Abstract

BackgroundPharmacogenomic technologies aim to redirect drug development to increase safety and efficacy of individual care. There is much hope that their implementation in the drug development process will help respond to population health needs, particularly in developing countries. However, there is also fear that novel pharmacogenomic drugs will remain too costly, be designed for the needs of the wealthy nations, and so constitute an unnecessary "luxury" for most populations. In this paper, we analyse the promise that pharmacogenomic technologies hold for improving global public health and identify strategies and challenges associated with their implementation.DiscussionThis paper evaluates the capacity of pharmacogenomic technologies to meet six criteria described by the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics group: 1) impact of the technology, 2) technology appropriateness, 3) capacity to address local burdens, 4) feasibility to be implemented in reasonable time, 5) capacity to reduce the knowledge gap, and 6) capacity for indirect benefits. We argue that the implementation of pharmacogenomic technologies in the drug development process can positively impact population health. However, this positive impact depends on how and for which purposes the technologies are used. We discuss the potential of these technologies to stimulate drug discovery in the case of rare (orphan diseases) or neglected diseases, but also to reduce acute adverse drug reactions in infectious disease treatment and prevention, which promises to improve global public health.ConclusionsThe implementation of pharmacogenomic technologies may lead to the development of drugs that appear to be a "luxury" for populations in need of numerous interventions that are known to have a demonstrable impact on population health (e.g., secure access to potable water, reduction of social inequities, health education). However, our analysis shows that pharmacogenomic technologies do have the potential to redirect drug development and distribution so as to improve the health of vulnerable populations. Strategies should thus be developed to better direct their implementation towards meeting the needs and responding to the realities of populations of the developing world (i.e., social, cultural and political acceptability, and local health burdens), making pharmacogenomic technologies a necessary "luxury" for global public health.

Highlights

  • Pharmacogenomic technologies aim to redirect drug development to increase safety and efficacy of individual care

  • The implementation of pharmacogenomic technologies may lead to the development of drugs that appear to be a “luxury” for populations in need of numerous interventions that are known to have a demonstrable impact on population health

  • Our analysis shows that pharmacogenomic technologies do have the potential to redirect drug development and distribution so as to improve the health of vulnerable populations

Read more

Summary

Discussion

The current international public health context is one where many populations have significant problems in accessing appropriate healthcare services and medications, constituting a major global injustice. 6) Capacity for indirect benefits Direct benefits of developing and distributing novel pharmacogenomic drugs that better respond to the needs and realities of developing world populations can be identified; amongst these are the recognition of specific health needs, faster and safer access to new drugs [88], increased population health [89], reductions in social and global health inequities known to impair individual health opportunities [90,91,92,93], and increased market or work opportunities for secondary actors in the drug distribution context (e.g., grocery stores, market stalls, itinerant hawkers or mobile vendors [94]) All these benefits can positively impact local population health, which would undoubtedly be positive for global public health. Drugs that may at first appear to constitute a luxury (e.g., pharmacogenomic drugs) may be a necessity

Conclusions
Background
Kemp S
26. Shastry BS
36. Basu P
43. Russell S
78. Hulot JS
Findings
89. Nyika A
92. Daniels N: Equity and Population Health
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call