Abstract

Pharmaceutical Industry–Initiated Postapproval Studies—Not Requested by the US FDA, Little Value, and Many Questions

Highlights

  • The study by Skydel et al[1] published in JAMA Network Open examined all 110 new therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2009 through 2012 and identified 37 for which there were no postmarketing requirements or commitments.[1]

  • Most contemporary approvals of new oncology therapeutics are made on the basis of surrogate outcomes, and 5 years after approval, 50% have not demonstrated an overall survival benefit.[3]

  • There is some disagreement in the literature, most agree that the shorter review time associated with priority approvals leads to the identification of more postmarket safety problems.[4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study by Skydel et al[1] published in JAMA Network Open examined all 110 new therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2009 through 2012 and identified 37 for which there were no postmarketing requirements or commitments.[1]. Why didn’t the FDA require postapproval studies for one-third of the therapeutics it approved? Premarket oncology trials are more likely to be single-arm, open-label, and nonrandomized trials.[2] Most contemporary approvals of new oncology therapeutics are made on the basis of surrogate outcomes, and 5 years after approval, 50% have not demonstrated an overall survival benefit.[3] there is some disagreement in the literature, most agree that the shorter review time associated with priority approvals leads to the identification of more postmarket safety problems.[4] Are there no important unanswered efficacy and safety questions for therapeutics with these characteristics?

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.