Abstract

In this research, seven equilibrium moisture content (EMC) and equilibrium relative humidity (ERH) equations (modified Henderson, Chung–Pfost, Modified Halsey, Henderson, Chen–Clayton, Iglesias–Chirife and modified Oswin) are compared on their ability to fit data for some medicinal and aromatic plants. Thirteen data sets comprising 13 plants are used. Comparisons are based on standard error of estimate, coefficient of determination, residual sum of square and residual plots. Both the modified Halsey and the modified Oswin equations were found as the most versatile models to accurately describe the equilibrium moisture content and equilibrium relative humidity (EMC/ERH) relationships for medicinal and aromatic plants. The modified Henderson equation is a good model for fennel and cinnamon. The Chung–Pfost equation is suitable for muscat, coriander, ginger and cinnamon. The Iglesias–Chirife, Henderson and Chen–Clayton equations are among the least successful models for medicinal and aromatic plants, respectively.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.