PGT-A: What Is Its Value in Treating Recurrent Pregnancy Loss?

Abstract

PGT has been widely applied in the world, but its effectiveness for the treatments of recurrent pregnancy loss is still inconclusive. There is currently no consensus over the precise definition of RPL, according to the ESHRE guideline in 2022, a diagnosis of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss (RPL) could be considered after the loss of two or more pregnancies. The etiology of RPL is complex and highly heterogeneous, the higher proportion of embryo aneuploidy is an important reason, which can be affected significantly by maternal age. RPL has been listed as one of the common indications for PGT-A worldwide. However, the new RPL guideline by EHSRE in 2022, indicated that limited evidence for PGT in couples with RPL shows no clear benefit of treatment with very low quality. We reviewed the published studies, three retrospective studies showed that PGT-A may improve live birth rate for RPL patients, while two studies showed negative results. Most importantly, there were no randomized studies published on the application of PGT-A among RPL couples. Our data also showed similar cumulative live birth rates between PGT-A group and the control, regardless of maternal age, but PGT-A may favour in reducing miscarriage recurrence risk for RPL couples over 37 years old who obtained transferrable embryos. The presence of mosaic embryos and false positive/negative results, which can cause a high rate of cycle cancellation, may be the main reasons that compromise the efficacy of PGT-A. The cost-effectiveness of PGT-A is another important concern. In conclusion, there is still no sufficient evidence to support whether PGT-A can effectively improve the pregnancy outcomes for RPL couples, and proper-designed RCT is required in the future.