Abstract
In this Study, the evolution and history of petroleum contracts is discussed with a focus on the recent major shift witnessed from Joint Operating Agreements (JOA) and Concession contracts to Production Sharing Agreements (PSA) due to the increase in the complexity of operations and funding difficulties especially from the government’s side. In addition to that, the fiscal system of PSA’s is studied as a legal instrument to allocate risk between the parties, identify ownership of assets, commitments and operational control. This study aims to figure out the application of economic evaluation for PSA’s using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF) which is considered to be powerful in evaluating the investment performance by calculating Net Present Value (NPV) of cash flows and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR). The estimated production profile submitted in the PSA of interest was exaggerated. When a Monte-Carlo Simulation was run the riskier profile (P10) was the closest to the PSA production forecast. However, in such agreements usually the mid case scenario (P50) is taken into consideration. The NPV for the first 10 years in this project is around $0.45 Billion compared to the total NPV calculated using the economic model $1.26 Billion. However, the recent instability of the oil price in the last 10 years what causes this project in particular not to meet the target so far. The IRR calculated for the 10 years period is almost the hurdle rate 10% and this is again due to the unexpected NPV due to the oil price. To reduce the uncertainty, pilot projects needs to be conducted in the first year in smaller spacing to allow for the response to be detected faster and then develop a Field Development Plan (FDP).
Highlights
Oil and Gas Industry Contracts According to Boykett et al (2012) petroleum contracts can be divided into four main types; concessions, joint operating agreements (JOA), service contracts and production sharing agreements (PSA)
The case is different for service contracts where the service company is paid a fee for its operation and the total oil production is owned by the state
In this study, an economic model, which consists of a combined deterministic and stochastic approach, was used to evaluate a production sharing agreement (PSA) for one of the fields in the Middle East. This field consists of many reservoirs and the study was conducted only on one of the reservoirs taking into consideration the field development plan (FDP) for this particular reservoir
Summary
Oil and Gas Industry Contracts According to Boykett et al (2012) petroleum contracts can be divided into four main types; concessions, joint operating agreements (JOA), service contracts and production sharing agreements (PSA). Concession is the old form of petroleum contracts It is an agreement in which the investor purchase the exclusive right from the state (land owner) to explore and extract natural resources from an agreed prospect. This right is given to the investor for some type of bonus or license fee. Joint operating agreements are contracts where governments and one or more International Oil Companies (IOC’s) agree to undertake a task of exploring or extracting oil from a defined prospect. The case is different for service contracts where the service company is paid a fee for its operation and the total oil production is owned by the state
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.