Abstract
We have studied the petrochemistry of degraded bones and sediment from the interior of four ossuaries (burial boxes) discovered in what is (arguably) believed to be the 1st century CE family tomb of the high priest Caiaphas (herewith Cft) in Jerusalem. During the course of the 1990 excavation, among other artifacts (e.g., a coin found in a skull) two iron nails were discovered. One of the nails was inside an ossuary, the other on the floor of one of the nearby “kokhim” (burial niches) which contained Ossuaries 5 and 6. According to the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) everything in the burial cave can be accounted for today except the iron nails “which have been misplaced”, this without being properly recorded or photographed. Investigative journalist Simcha Jacobovici believes that he has located the nails in the artifacts collection of the Anthropology laboratory at Tel Aviv University. The IAA, however, has stated that the lost nails from the Cft have nothing to do with the nails found at the university and the latter nails must have a different provenance. Wherever lies the truth, the presence of two nails in the Cft is of profound interest because in the New Testament the high priest Caiaphas was responsible for passing Jesus to the Romans who then sent him to the cross. The possibility that the nails were used in a crucifixion on the one hand and can be connected to Caiaphas the high priest on the other is, to say the least, interesting and potentially monumental. Aware of the controversy but also of the importance of the two unprovenanced nails we have investigated the materials which have invaded the interiors of the Cft ossuaries and in a similar manner materials that have adhered to the two unprovenanced nails. Employing geochemical and petrochemical Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM-EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and δ18O and δ13C isotope analyses we have found that the organic and inorganic materials flushed into the interior of the Cft but also those that have adhered to the two unprovenanced nails possess and display many identical, and what can also be termed unique chemical and physical characteristics. Based on the collective evidence we conclude, with considerable confidence, that the unprovenanced nails are the lost nails excavated from the Caiaphas family tomb in 1990 and furthermore that these nails were used in a crucifixion.
Highlights
Jerusalem, Caiaphas Tomb Ossuaries, Crucifixion Nails, Accreted Cedar Wood, Tracheids, Microbial Infestation, Bone Degradation, Lepidocrocite, Goethite, Magnetite, Botryoids, Accretion Rims, Fungal Sporangium, Spores, Hyphae, Bone Microfabric, Yeast Cells, Trabeculae, Bacterial Biofilm, Hellenistic Period Aqueduct, scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and δ18O δ13C Isotopes
Ploying geochemical and petrochemical Scanning Electron Microscope (SEMEDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and δ18O and δ13C isotope analyses we have found that the organic and inorganic materials flushed into the interior of the Cft and those that have adhered to the two unprovenanced nails possess and display many identical, and what can be termed unique chemical and physical characteristics
Gaby Barkai, Telegraph, UK, 12 April, 2011).”. Such lofty declarations and academic disputes pertaining to the Caiaphas family tomb and two crucifixion nails found therein have in major part been confined to the media and scholars in the fields of archaeology, anthropology and divinity
Summary
“There is no proof whatsoever that those nails came from the cave of Caiaphas. There is no proof that the nails are connected to any bones, or that there is any bone residue attached to the nails. Israel Hershkovitz showed them to journalist Simcha Jacobovici who, based on his investigation of the Caiaphas family tomb finds, hypothesized that the two unprovenanced nails in the unmarked box were the missing nails from the Cft (Jacobovici, 2014) He further surmised that, given their morphology, these nails may have been used in a crucifixion and in view of their archaeological context (tomb of the high priest Caiaphas) the crucifixion may have been that of Jesus of Nazareth. Far the only unambiguous physical evidence of nails used in a crucifixion is the 11.5 cm long Heel Bone nail from the crucifixion of Yehohanan Ben Hagaol discovered in a Jerusalem tomb in 1968 The gravity of these implications have led us to carry out the present in-depth scientific investigation of materials in the Caiaphas tomb ossuaries and of the two unprovenanced nails from Prof. Such a geochemical-petrochemical study of provenancing materials excavated from tomb ossuaries has, to the best of our knowledge, only one precedent—our recently published study on the ossuaries and materials from the nearby Talpiot—“Jesus family” tomb (Shimron et al, 2020, and Figure 1)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
