Peters Anomaly: Novel Non-Invasive Alternatives to Penetrating Keratoplasty

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Peters’ anomaly (PA) is the most commonly encountered congenital corneal opacity (CCO) and displays a wide phenotypical range. The relatively recent adoption of high-quality anterior segment imaging in the form of high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography has aided in the accurate diagnosis of CCOs, facilitated distinction of PA from “pseudo-Peters’ anomaly,” and aided in prognostication and surgical risk stratification in PA. While the definitive management of PA, especially the more severe forms, is penetrating keratoplasty (PK), long-term success rates have overall been disappointing. This spurred the development of more non-invasive procedures, such as optical iridectomy and the more recently described selective endothelial removal, which represent viable alternatives to PK, at least in the less severe phenotypes of PA. Methods Literature searches for the components of this review were performed using PubMed, in September 2021. The following keywords and their iterations were employed for the searches: “Peters’ anomaly,” “anterior segment dysgenesis,” “kerato-irido-lenticular dysgenesis,” “congenital corneal opacities.” These were entered into the PubMed search engine, revealing 2852 related articles. The inclusion criteria included publications in the English language, specific to Peters’ anomaly. Fifty-five studies that were published as systematic reviews or as nonrandomized comparative studies (cohort or case series) on the topic of Peters’ anomaly were finally selected for this review. Results This review provides a summary of Peters’ anomaly in the context of advances in diagnosis, classification, and genotype–phenotype correlation of congenital corneal opacities, with a focus on penetrating keratoplasty, its outcomes, and non-invasive surgical options. While conservative therapies such as spontaneous clearing, mydriatic eye drops, and optical iridectomy may have variable success in milder variants of PA, penetrating keratoplasty in these eyes is fraught with several challenges and typically results in poor long-term functional outcomes. The management strategy depends on several variables such as phenotypical severity of PA, laterality, age at presentation, and capacity to adhere to the follow-up schedule. Notwithstanding the choice of treatment, it is essential that early and aggressive amblyopia therapy, a thorough systemic examination, and appropriate referral are undertaken for all patients of PA. Conclusion Peters’ anomaly has seen recent advances in diagnosis, but treatment options remain limited. Focus directed towards less-invasive alternatives to keratoplasty may yield better functional outcomes.