Abstract

BackgroundPreterm birth is in quantity and in severity the most important topic in obstetric care in the developed world. Progestogens and cervical pessaries have been studied as potential preventive treatments with conflicting results. So far, no study has compared both treatments.Methods/designThe Quadruple P study aims to compare the efficacy of vaginal progesterone and cervical pessary in the prevention of adverse perinatal outcome associated with preterm birth in asymptomatic women with a short cervix, in singleton and multiple pregnancies separately. It is a nationwide open-label multicentre randomized clinical trial (RCT) with a superiority design and will be accompanied by an economic analysis. Pregnant women undergoing the routine anomaly scan will be offered cervical length measurement between 18 and 22 weeks in a singleton and at 16–22 weeks in a multiple pregnancy. Women with a short cervix, defined as less than, or equal to 35 mm in a singleton and less than 38 mm in a multiple pregnancy, will be invited to participate in the study.Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either progesterone or a cervical pessary. Following randomization, the silicone cervical pessary will be placed during vaginal examination or 200 mg progesterone capsules will be daily self-administered vaginally. Both interventions will be continued until 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whichever comes first.Primary outcome will be composite adverse perinatal outcome of perinatal mortality and perinatal morbidity including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage grade III and IV, periventricular leukomalacia higher than grade I, necrotizing enterocolitis higher than stage I, Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) or culture proven sepsis. These outcomes will be measured up until 10 weeks after the expected due date. Secondary outcomes will be, among others, time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 28, 32, 34 and 37 weeks, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for threatened preterm labour and costs.DiscussionThis trial will provide evidence on whether vaginal progesterone or a cervical pessary is more effective in decreasing adverse perinatal outcome in both singletons and multiples.Trial registrationTrial registration number: NTR 4414. Date of registration January 29th 2014.

Highlights

  • Preterm birth is in quantity and in severity the most important topic in obstetric care in the developed world

  • * Correspondence: m.d.vanzijl@amc.nl 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Full list of author information is available at the end of the article van Zijl et al BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2017) 17:284 (Continued from previous page). This trial will provide evidence on whether vaginal progesterone or a cervical pessary is more effective in decreasing adverse perinatal outcome in both singletons and multiples

  • In 2014, an updated Cochrane systematic review reported on the effectiveness of progesterone in the prevention of preterm birth (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.98) in women with threatened or established preterm labour, the author’s concluded that due to the low number of included trials, there was insufficient evidence to justify progestational agents as a tocolytic agent for women presenting with preterm labour [6]

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Prevention of PTB remains one of the main goals in obstetric care. Over the past years both mechanical interventions such as a cervical pessary and pharmacological interventions such as progesterone were evaluated. Vaginal progesterone as well as a pessary have been shown to be potentially effective measures for the prevention of preterm birth. Both interventions are relatively simple and can be combined with regular care. Up to now, no study has directly compared treatment with progesterone and cervical pessary At this moment, other international study groups have set up trials to assess both progesterone and cervical pessaries as a preventive strategy for preterm birth. Other international study groups have set up trials to assess both progesterone and cervical pessaries as a preventive strategy for preterm birth Pooling data of these trials can hopefully help to conclude which intervention is most efficacious in preterm birth prevention. Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG) West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands. 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU Medical Centre (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands. 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 10Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands. 11Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands. 12Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands. 13Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 14Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. 15Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 16Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands. 17Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 18Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. 19Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands. 20Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands. 21Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, The Netherlands. 22Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands. 23Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zaans Medical Centre (ZMC), Zaandam, The Netherlands. 24Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maasziekenhuis Pantein, Boxmeer, The Netherlands. 25Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. 26Robinson Research Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Background
Methods/Design
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call