Abstract

Watch the VIDEO here.There is widespread agreement that our practices of scholarly communication are a long way from being optimal, and that this has become particularly true in the last twenty years. In principle, the internet should make dissemination almost free and allow for new forms of communication such as "grey literature" and the sharing of data. And yet, while the internet has undoubtedly changed all our lives for the better, articles in conventional and extremely expensive journals continue to be the dominant means of communication, and it has proved to be very difficult to change the system to take advantage of the new opportunities. I shall discuss the various incentives that give the current system its robustness, and make a few suggestions for how they can be weakened. To do this I shall draw on my own experiences of campaigning for change, and also report on some important changes that have already taken place in the communication practices of mathematicians.

Highlights

  • Creators need financial incentives Good content is expensive to produce if you insist on antiquated methods of production

  • 3 Almost all the interesting recent content is available on arXiv. 4 And still libraries pay huge subscription fees!

  • Gowers (University of Cambridge) Perverse incentives: how the reward structures of acadNeomvieamimbepre2d2ensdc,h2o0la1r7ly comm25un/ic2a5tio

Read more

Summary

The reality

Gowers (University of Cambridge) Perverse incentives: how the reward structures of acadeNmoivaeimmbpeerd2e2sncdh,o2la0r1ly7comm7un/ic2a5tio

Why do we need barriers to access?
Why do barriers matter?
Why is so much mathematical output behind paywalls?
The players
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call