Abstract

A superintegrable system has more integrals of motion than degrees d of freedom. The quasi-periodic motions then spin around tori of dimension n<d. Already under integrable perturbations almost all n-tori will break up; in the non-degenerate case the resulting d-tori have n fast and d−n slow frequencies. Such d-parameter families of d-tori do survive Hamiltonian perturbations as Cantor families of d-tori. A perturbation of a superintegrable system that admits a better approximation by a non-degenerate integrable perturbation of the superintegrable system is said to remove the degeneracy. In the minimal case d=n+1 this can be achieved by means of averaging, but the more integrals of motion the superintegrable system admits the more difficult becomes the perturbation analysis.

Highlights

  • Integrable Hamiltonian systems are in d ≥ 2 degrees of freedom the exception rather than the rule

  • KAM theory is about integrable systems—under strong non-resonance conditions their quasi-periodic solutions persist under sufficiently small perturbations

  • In the minimally superintegrable case of d + 1 conserved quantities the perturbation analysis consists of three steps: compute a normal form that serves as intermediate system, study how the dynamics of the intermediate system structures the phase space (organized by the fast (d − 1)-tori, the relative equilibria) and check the necessary non-degeneracy conditions concerning both the superintegrable system and the reduced intermediate system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Integrable Hamiltonian systems are in d ≥ 2 degrees of freedom the exception rather than the rule. In the extreme case of a maximally superintegrable system one has to study the Hamiltonian system in d − 1 degrees of freedom that is obtained by averaging the perturbation along the unperturbed periodic orbits and reducing the acquired S1-symmetry. Normal forms provide the means to obtain intermediate systems, and the most obvious way is to normalize by averaging along the unperturbed dynamics In general such an intermediate system inherits n + 1 integrals of motion in involution and the perturbation is said to remove the degeneracy [3] in case of a (non-degenerate) integrable intermediate system.

Unperturbed Dynamics
Minimally Superintegrable Systems
The Euler Top
The Logarithmic Potential
Resonant Equilibria
Integrable Resonances
Non-integrable Resonances
Higher Superintegrability
Perturbations That Remove the Degeneracy
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.