Abstract
Background: Currently, there is no standardised assessment tool to assess facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery. Inter-centre comparison is hampered by the use of different aesthetic indices with low intra- and inter-rater reliability.
 Aim: The Perth scoring system is a new assessment tool for unilateral cleft lip which scores four key components of the cleft lip/nose repair: lip length, white roll, alar insertion point and vermillion. The aim of this study was to validate the Perth scoring system as a reliable and useful new assessment tool and to demonstrate the use of the scoring system to measure improvements after cleft lip revision.
 Method: Nineteen patients who underwent cleft lip revision by the senior author were selected. Pre- and postoperative photos were presented to a panel of raters to score. Scores were analysed to determine the intra-and inter-rater reliability and to compare outcomes.
 Results: Almost all patients (15/16) had improvement in scores (range 1.09–5.59) after cleft lip revision. Intra raters’ agreement scores from lowest to highest were: lip length (0.65), white roll (0.7), alar insertion point (0.78) and vermillion (0.78). The total intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.96 (0.94–0.98, 95% CI, P<0.000).
 Conclusion: This new scoring system is a valid and useful tool for assessment of the unilateral cleft lip. The high rate of intra- and inter-rater reliability allow it to serve as a useful tool to compare surgical outcomes both within and between centres. Further field testing with a larger cohort of patients is required.
Highlights
There is no doubt that society has become obsessed with physical image
The high rate of intra- and inter-rater reliability allow it to serve as a useful tool to compare surgical outcomes both within and between centres
Nineteen patients were identified through the hospital database who had undergone a cleft lip revision during the allocated time period and met the inclusion criteria
Summary
There is no doubt that society has become obsessed with physical image. In the advent of the ‘selfie’ we have been bombarded by images of glamour and beauty. Advances in technology and the editing and manipulation of photos driven by social media has reinforced the drive towards perfection. This has led to users becoming more anxious, less confident and feeling less physically attractive afterwards.[1,2,3] Needless to say, patients with any physical deformity are left feeling marginalised compared to their peers in a world where even ‘normal’ appears not to be good enough. There is no standardised assessment tool to assess facial aesthetics in cleft lip and palate surgery. Inter-centre comparison is hampered by the use of different aesthetic indices with low intra- and inter-rater reliability
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have