Abstract
The article focuses on the question of new communication form appearance – the internet communication, namely political internet communication, that furthermore influenced the appearance of the new genres, among which we can find twitting. The active twitting usage with the communicative aim in political sphere puts the question about language learning namely about the means of expression of the persuasive language influence in the analyzed genre, as the persuasive language influence function is one of the most important functions in political internet-communication from psycholinguistic point of view. The research process found out the range of verbal expression meanings of explicit and implicit persuasiveness. To the verbal meanings of implicit persuasiveness, we can refer the usage of imperatives and imperative constructions, explicit performatives, constructions with modal verbs, short sentences, and slogans. The verbal meanings of implicit persuasiveness include rhetorical questions, affirmative sentences, and famous people’s citations. To the special language meanings, which encourage the influence on the addressee we also refer the usage of elliptical sentences, parcelation, repetition. The mostly used lexical and stylistic meanings, that encourage the fulfillment of the main purposes of political discourse is the usage of metaphor, metonymy, irony, personification and oxymoron. The research allowed us to come to conclusion, that the English-speaking political internet-communication is characterized with the usage of the same verbal appellation meanings as traditional communication. But we can also outline the meanings peculiar only to the internet communication and especially the twitting genre. For the research methodology we took out modern scientific conceptions. The research methodology was developed according the framework of genre study, psycholinguistics, 2.0, virtual genre study. According to the aim and tasks, general and linguistic research methods were used.
Highlights
The study further presented in this article is embedded into the notion of computer-mediated communication, a term that became widely known in linguistics (Herring & Androutsopoulos, 2015; Thurlow et al, 2004), after it appeared in the title of an influential online publication, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Crystal, 2011: 1) and in the work of Nancy Baron (Baron, 1984)
The terms psycholinguistics 2.0 or even psycholinguistics 3.0 are suggested to specify a separate field of linguistics analysis covering psycholinguistic research directly impacted by web 2.0 or web 3.0 technologies, e.g. the use of web 2.0 technologies in language acquisition studies, or impact of political leaders’ speech on the citizenry, etc. (Goroshko, 2009)
In order to describe the psycholinguistic component in online communication realized with the help of web 2.0 platforms and gadgets we propose to use the term psycholinguistics 2.0 that emphasizes the psycholinguistic research component in this process
Summary
The study further presented in this article is embedded into the notion of computer-mediated communication, a term that became widely known in linguistics (Herring & Androutsopoulos, 2015; Thurlow et al, 2004), after it appeared in the title of an influential online publication, the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (Crystal, 2011: 1) and in the work of Nancy Baron (Baron, 1984). An active use of the Internet for communication in the political sphere raises the question of studying the means of expressing persuasiveness in the genre under investigation since one of the most essential areas of psycholinguistics (as one of the fields of linguistics, political linguistics) is the analysis of language as the main means of conducting speech activity, the main means of communication.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have