Abstract
Dontcheva-Navratilova studies persuasion in academic discourse from a useful doubly contrastive perspective by exploring cross-cultural and disciplinary variation in persuasive strategies and persuasive language in Anglophone and Czech linguistics and economics research articles. As well as considering the contribution of the ethical, logical and pathetic appeals to persuasion in research articles, the chapter draws attention to the crucial role of interactional metadiscourse resources in expressing the writer’s persuasive intents. Combining corpus-based and qualitative analyses, Dontcheva-Navratilova discusses similarities and differences in the use of stance and engagement markers across Anglophone and Czech linguistics and economics research articles and concludes that linguacultural background and discipline tend to govern different aspects of rhetorical and language choices partaking in the build-up of persuasion in academic discourse.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
