Perspectives of Neglect
Child Abuse ReviewVolume 21, Issue 2 p. 77-80 EditorialFree Access Perspectives of Neglect First published: 26 March 2012 https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2208Citations: 3AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Neglect is a common, yet under-recognised form of child maltreatment (Glaser, 2002). In the UK, neglect is the most common category of abuse for children who are the subject of a child protection plan and its damaging effects on children and young people's health and wellbeing have been highlighted in two recent high-profile reports (Burgess et al., 2012; Daniel et al., 2011). Neglect is a significant public health issue, it is an underlying feature in many serious case reviews (reviews of non-accidental child deaths) and in extreme cases may be the direct cause of death (Brandon et al., 2010). Neglect rarely comes to light as a result of a specific incident (Hildyard and Wolfe, 2002) and often relies on practitioners making a judgement about the adequacy of ongoing care within a child and family context. Daniel (2005, p. 15) has described how a definition of neglect ‘must always be accompanied by careful delineation of the circumstances within which the child is living, the current and likely future physical and emotional impact and an analysis of the parental context’. It is the persistent failure to meet a child's needs and provide adequate care which is often significant, with its cumulative negative effects being detrimental to the child over a considerable period of time (Powell, 2007). ‘An underlying feature in many serious case reviews and in extreme cases may be the direct cause of death’ Yet, defining and identifying the presenting features of neglect are difficult and it is widely recognised as challenging for practitioners and researchers (Daniel et al., 2011; Taylor et al., 2005). The first paper in this issue describes how one borough council in the UK, Blackburn with Darwen, implemented a strategic approach to address the challenge of what constitutes adequate care. This council introduced multi-agency training workshops with 200 staff and appreciative working practices, to support the introduction of the Graded Care Profile (GCP) tool for supporting professional judgements about child neglect. Bernie Carter (2012) describes an evaluation study which took place alongside the initiative to investigate what was working well within child neglect practice and what changes occurred following implementation of the GCP. Despite initial reservations about the new model of working, over the course of the project there was a shift in the discourse of practitioners implementing the GCP from a focus on ‘neglect’ to a consideration of ‘quality of care’. Carter (2012, p. 95) reports how use of the GCP added ‘greater criticality’ to the professionals' observations of cases of neglect, ‘helped practitioners to have more positive conversations with parents’ and was helpful for less experienced practitioners. ‘A strategic approach to address the challenge of what constitutes adequate care’ In the second paper, June Slee (2012) outlines how in the Northern Territory of Australia failure to send children to school is classified as neglect by the Department of Health and Families. Slee describes how Indigenous children in Australia's remote Northern Territory have the poorest literacy and numeracy outcomes in Australia, as well as the highest rates of school non-attendance. In her informative paper, she contends that because authorities do not insist on children attending school and therefore fail to provide them with learning opportunities, that this is a form of systemic neglect. The paper examines some of the reasons for students' low school attendance, including the transient movement of Indigenous populations living in very remote areas and some children and families not seeing the value of education. Slee (2012, p. 111) argues that the key to addressing systemic neglect of school non-attendance and poor school performance is to attract and prepare Indigenous teachers to work at all levels, who can provide ‘culturally appropriate curricula’ as well as developing culturally responsive teaching amongst non-Indigenous staff. ‘Authorities do not insist on children attending school and therefore fail to provide them with learning opportunities’ Continuing the international focus on Australia, Shanti Raman and colleagues (2012) report on a research study which sought to examine whether front-line clinicians in general practice and hospital settings are equipped with the ability and confidence to address child abuse and neglect. Their survey, conducted in south west Sydney, involved general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses working in primary care and emergency department (ED) doctors and nurses. These researchers found that while the majority of respondents understood their statutory and professional responsibilities to report suspected abuse or neglect, confidence levels in identifying abuse and neglect varied significantly between the two groups, with emergency doctors being the most consistent and practice nurses the least. The clinicians reported being most confident identifying physical abuse and neglect and less confident identifying emotional and sexual abuse. Of the 80 per cent of clinicians who had received some prior training in child abuse and neglect, 70 per cent of ED nurses, practice nurses and GPs reported their training to be inadequate, in comparison to 19 per cent of the ED doctors. These researchers conclude that there are significant differences between the confidence and reporting behaviour between front-line clinicians working in EDs and those working in primary care, and recommend targeted child protection training for front-line clinicians working in general practice. ‘Confidence levels in identifying abuse and neglect varied significantly between the two groups’ In a short report in this issue, Colette Selebo and colleagues (2012) describe an evaluation of a new specialist training programme developed in conjunction with the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health for paediatricians involved in legal processes. The two-day course on court skills training, delivered in a court setting, focused on family courts and criminal proceedings and explored the different orders available to the courts in child protection proceedings. The course provided participants with an opportunity to present evidence in mock trial sessions and to be cross-examined by two barristers. Evaluation feedback was received from 13 out of 15 students who participated in the course. All found the course highly relevant, with students being extremely positive about the value of preparing and presenting evidence in a mock trial. Following the two-day training course, seven participants had an opportunity to observe judges and barristers in a total of 14 cases representing a mixture of family, civil and criminal proceedings, including two cases of alleged neglect. The authors conclude that the success of the training is linked to the high staff-student ratio, and that such training is extremely important in improving the confidence of paediatricians when presenting evidence in court. ‘The course provided participants with an opportunity to present evidence in mock trial sessions’ Daryl Dugdale and Carol Wells (2012) in the final article of this issue address the subject of interprofessional training in the field of safeguarding children. These authors describe the development of a process and tool in which those responsible for inter-agency child protection training could be supported to audit and review the conditions in which training programmes were being delivered. The authors describe the three phases of the development of the audit tool, which included: (i) a review of the existing research and literature to identify key standards; (ii) adaptation of an existing model ‘to audit the conditions for delivery of effective inter-agency training’ (Dugdale and Wells, 2012, p. 143) and measure against existing standards; and (iii) testing of the tool with a number of Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCBs) and an interactive presentation with 70 interprofessional trainers who had an opportunity to try out the tool and provide feedback, which led to further development of the audit tool. The ‘Make a Difference’ tool is the outcome of the project. The authors report that the review tool is divided into three key areas of provision, participants and practice systems, which provide a framework to ‘demonstrate the training function's strengths and weakness’ (Dugdale and Wells, 2012, p. 148). Dugdale and Wells argue that the review tool's requirement to evidence responses results in a plan that can be owned and actions prioritised by the LSCB. ‘70 interprofessional trainers who had an opportunity to try out the tool and provide feedback, which led to further development of the audit tool’ The book review in this issue is by Jo Hebb (2012) who reviews Daniel Wilcox's authoritative and multi-authored practitioner's guide to the use of the polygraph in assessing, treating and supervising sex offenders. References Brandon M, Bailey S, Belderson P. 2010. Building on the Learning from Serious Case Reviews: A Two-year Analysis of Child Protection Database Notifications 2007–2009. Department for Education: London. Google Scholar Burgess C, Daniel B, Scott J, Mulley K, Derbyshire D, Downie M. 2012. Child neglect in 2011. First annual report on child neglect from Action for Children and the University of Stirling: Watford. Google Scholar Carter B. 2012. Developing and implementing an appreciative ‘quality of care’ approach to child neglect practice. Child Abuse Review 21: 81– 98. DOI: 10.1002/car.1198 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Daniel B. 2005. Introduction to issues for health and social care in neglect. In Child Neglect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care, J Taylor, B Daniel, O Stevenson (eds). Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London. Google Scholar Daniel B, Taylor J, Scott J, Derbyshire D, Neilson D. 2011. Recognizing and Helping the Neglected Child. Evidence-Based Practice Assessment and Intervention. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London. Google Scholar Dugdale D, Wells C. 2012. The Development of an Auditing tool to Support the Delivery of Inter-professional Training within the Field of Safeguarding Children. Child Abuse Review 21: 141– 150. DOI: 10.1002/car.1157 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Glaser D. 2002. Emotional abuse and neglect (psychological maltreatment): a conceptual frameowork. Child Abuse & Neglect 26: 697– 714. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gough D, Stanley N. 2007. Policy, Practice and Decision Making in Child Neglect. Child Abuse Review 16: 71– 73. DOI: 10.1002/car.985 Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar Hebb J. 2012. Book review of The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating and Supervising Sex Offenders. A Practitioner's Guide edited by D. T. Wilcox. Child Abuse Review 21: 151– 152. DOI: 10.1002/car.1147 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hildyard KL, Wolfe DA. 2002. Child neglect: developmental issues and outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect 26: 679– 695. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Powell C. 2007. Safeguarding Children and Young People. A Guide for Nurses and Midwives. Open University Press: Maidenhead. Google Scholar Raman S, Holdgate A, Torrens R. 2012. Are our Frontline Clinicians Equipped with the Ability and Confidence to Address Child Abuse and Neglect? Child Abuse Review 21: 114– 130. DOI: 10.1002/car1180 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Slee J. 2012. Addressing systemic neglect of young indigenous children's rights to attend school in the Northern Territory, Australia. Child Abuse Review 21: 99– 113. DOI: 10.1002/car1166 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Solebo C, Sidebotham P, Watson C. 2012. Preparing Paediatricians for Court: Evaluation of A Court Skills Training Programme. Child Abuse Review 21: 131– 140. DOI: 10.1002/car1161 Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Taylor J, Daniel B, Stevenson O. 2005. Child Neglect: Practice Issues for Health and Social Care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers: London. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume21, Issue2March/April 2012Pages 77-80 ReferencesRelatedInformation
- Front Matter
93
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.01.033
- Jun 1, 2006
- The Journal of Pediatrics
Child Abuse Pediatrics: A new pediatric subspecialty
- Research Article
10
- 10.5144/0256-4947.2000.430
- Sep 1, 2000
- Annals of Saudi Medicine
The problem of child abuse was first described by Kempe et al. in their landmark article entitled "the battered child syndrome" which was published in 1962. Since then the problem has had increased recognition worldwide and legal solutions and state-enforced statutes have been put in place to combat this menace in many Western countries. In the US child abuse is the second most important cause of serious head injuries and deaths after motor vehicle accidents. There are only a few published reports of child abuse in Saudi Arabia the majority of them from tertiary care hospitals in Riyadh and a recent one from Jubail. In this communication we report three cases of child abuse seen in Civil Hospital Khamis Mushayt in the year 1999. This is the first report of child abuse to be presented from this region of Saudi Arabia. (excerpt)
- Research Article
- 10.53819/81018102t5031
- Nov 4, 2021
- Journal of Education
Child neglect and abuse is expressed as the failure of parent, guardian, or other caregiver to attend to a child's fundamental demands. Thus, the study sought to examine effect of child abuse and neglect on academic performance in schools in Canada. The target population included 374 teachers and learners. Questionnaires were utilized to gather the information. The research found there is a significant impact of child abuse and neglect on students' academic performance. The results indicated that when child abuse and neglect increase by one unit, the student's academic performance will reduce by 0.3441 units when other factors are held constant. Preventing child abuse and neglect requires addressing risk and protective factors at the individual, relational, community, and societal levels. Child abuse is whereby a parent or any other individual who has a duty for the child protection causes injury, death, emotional harm, or risk of severe damage to a child. Child abuse can include physical abuse, sexual assault, exploitation, and psychological abuse. Psychological abuse is the most typical form of abuse, with physical abuse being the most reported and sexual assault being the least reported. Child abuse and neglect impact learning adversely. The research suggested that parents constantly show their children love and affection and meet their needs. The government should put mechanisms to protect children from any form of abuse. The neglected children need to be helped by the community or government with the basic needs to enhance their survival. It was recommended that public engagement and education campaigns and practical approaches be adopted to reduce corporal punishment. The communities need to be engaged in efforts to address family needs, and families need to be able to access supports and resources where they live, work, and worship. Keywords: Child Abuse, Neglect, Academic Performance, Canada
- Research Article
6
- 10.1111/jcap.12463
- Apr 22, 2024
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing
Nurses have a key role in the recognition, reporting, and channelization of child abuse and neglect. Nurses should have sufficient knowledge about the presentation of child abuse and neglect. They also need to understand their role in reporting any instance where they detect cases of abuse and neglect. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of a structured Child Neglect and Abuse Educational Program (CNaA-EP) on the level of knowledge and awareness of nursing students about child neglect and abuse. This study conducted with nursing students used a pretest-post-test quasi-experimental design. The third-year nursing students were divided into two groups: experimental (n = 25) and control groups (n = 30). The intervention group received CNaA-EP. In both groups, pretests were performed using the "Child Abuse and Neglect Awareness Scale," and "Child Abuse and Neglect Knowledge Test" The posttest was conducted 1 week after the 14-week CNaA-EP course was completed. Numbers, percentages, chi-square test, t-test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Fisher's exact test were conducted using SPSS 22.00 software. The education group's scores of child abuse/neglect awareness (t = -2.768 p < 0.05) and child abuse/neglect knowledge (t = -12.416 p < 0.01) were significantly higher than those of the control group. After the education program, a significant difference was found between the education and control groups on the core measures. A child neglect and abuse education program was an effective method of educating nursing students on knowledge and awareness of child abuse and neglect. For this reason, education programs should be planned and implemented to increase awareness about abuse and neglect problems that threaten children's health and development.
- Research Article
2
- 10.51972/tfsd.1240794
- Jul 28, 2023
- Turkish Journal of Science and Health
Purpose: This study aims to investigate the awareness of nursing department students about child neglect and abuse and their attitudes about reporting cases of child neglect and abuse. Material and Methods: The study population consisted of 464 students studying at the Department of Nursing of the Faculty of Health Sciences of a university. No sampling was performed in the study, and 331 students who agreed to participate in the research were included in the study. The data were collected using the Personal Information Form, The Diagnosis Scale of The Risks and Symptoms of Child Abuse and Neglect and the Healthcare Provider Attitudes Toward Child Maltreatment Reporting Scale. The research data were collected by the researchers by face-to-face interview method between March-April 2022.In the analysis of the data, percentage distributions, averages, the t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used. Results: The Diagnosis Scale of the Risks and Symptoms of Child Abuse and Neglect score average of the students participating in the study was 3.66±0.41, and their score average on the Healthcare Provider Attitudes Toward Child Maltreatment Reporting Scale was 67.14±7.47. A significant difference was found between the students' gender, year in school, the status of having received a course/lesson/training on neglect and abuse, and their average scores on The Diagnosis Scale of The Risks and Symptoms of Child Abuse and Neglect and the Healthcare Provider Attitudes Toward Child Maltreatment Reporting Scale. It was found that there was a positive and significant relationship between students' knowledge levels on child abuse and neglect and their attitudes towards reporting child abuse. Conclusion: Professionals working in the field of health have an important role in the prevention, detection and treatment of abuse and neglect cases. For this reason, education of professionals, society, families and children working on this issue is at the forefront of the actions that need to be aware of to identify and report neglect and abuse.
- Research Article
27
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.014
- May 18, 2022
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Investments in Adverse Childhood Experience Prevention Efforts
- Discussion
21
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.03.054
- Jul 1, 2004
- The Journal of Pediatrics
World report on violence and health: What it means for children and pediatricians
- Research Article
23
- 10.5455/pmb.1-1453795052
- Jan 1, 2016
- TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin
In this study, we aimed to determine the level of available information and gaps which are related to child abuse and neglect in last ten tears. Literature review made on systematic reviews and meta-analysis in Pubmed database that has the “ Child abuse and neglect” or “Child maltreatment” keywords. Studies published in English through 1st January 2005- 31th March 2015 were reviewed. Totally 112 article were resulted in the search but only 101 of them were full text and also 59 systematic review excluded in the study. 42 articles were examined which are matching the criterias. Articles were classified according to subjects of the articles (identification, prevention, intervention, identification of the relationships, and others), types of child abuse-neglect (physical, emotional, sexual and others). Although we reached the systematic reviews related to child neglect and all types of child abuse, systematic reviews about emotional and sexual abuse are inadequate. The studies about intervention and identification of relations are insufficient. We observed the gap in the literature, in this direction. Child abuse and neglect regardless of the kind; create irreversible trauma and also leads to problems in the child's adulthood. Therefore; identification and prevention is a priority, If prevention is impossible; it is a quite vital importance to intervent as soon as possible. Despite the achievement of systematic compilation associated with child neglect and abuse; especially intervention studies about emotional and sexual abuse were found as inadequate.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/car.2436
- Mar 1, 2016
- Child Abuse Review
What Helps Children and Young People Move Forward Following Child Maltreatment?
- Research Article
- 10.62663/pjpprp.v5i1.94
- Apr 16, 2014
- PJPPRP
The aim of the present study was to seek relationship between childhood abuse, neglect and personality disorder in drug users. It was hypothesized that (1) there is likely to be a relationship between childhood neglect and personality disorder, (2) childhood neglect and abuse is likely to predict personality disorders in drug users. The data was comprised ofN=50 participants (male) taken from different teaching hospitals of Lahore; Mayo Hospital Lahore, Ganga Ram Hospital Lahore, Punjab Institute of Mental Health and Fountain House. The data was collected with the help of Demographic Questionnaire, Childhood Abuse and Neglect Questionnaire (Sitwat &Yousaf, 2010) and Comprehensive Diagnostic Instrument for Personality Disorder (CDIP) (Dawood & Khan, 2010). Pearson Product Moment was employed to find out the correlation between childhood abuse, neglect and personality disorders. Stepwise Regression analysis was done to see predictors of personality disorders. The results of Pearson product moment correlation among study variables revealed that emotional abuse and neglectwas significantly and positively related with schizoid personality disorder, whereas sexual abuse and neglect was found significantly and positively related to the narcissistic personality disorder.Results of regression analysis revealed that sexual abuse and neglect was the only variable which significantly predicting narcissistic personality disorder,whereas emotional abuse and neglect was found significant predictor ofschizoid personality disorder.
- Research Article
30
- 10.1177/0886260514536274
- Jun 13, 2014
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Child abuse and neglect have a potentially deleterious impact on children's physical, social, and psychological development. Preschool teachers may play a crucial role in the protection, early detection, and the intervention of child abuse and neglect, as they have the opportunity to establish a close contact with the families and to observe day-to-day changes in pupils' behavior. The main purpose of this study is to investigate preschool teachers' experiences and characteristics in relation to their awareness of possible child abuse and neglect signs. A questionnaire survey was designed and administered to 197 preschool teachers who work for the public preschools in the Izmir province of Turkey. In addition to the questionnaire items, a 34-item Likert-type scale measuring the level of familiarity with possible signs of child abuse and neglect was developed. This scale had an internal consistency of 0.94. The results revealed that 10.65% of preschool teachers had training regarding violence against children and 2.03% of them had training in child abuse and neglect. Overall, 35% of all teachers reported that they had prior experience with pupils who were exposed to child abuse and neglect. Moreover, statistical analyses indicated that being a parent and having training in child abuse and neglect, having experience with maltreated children, and having higher job status were significant factors in preschool teachers' ability to recognize the possible signs of child abuse and neglect. Our results support that teacher training in child abuse and neglect can play an important role in preschool teachers' awareness of the possible signs of child abuse and neglect.
- Research Article
2
- 10.7759/cureus.51470
- Jan 1, 2024
- Cureus
Background Healthcare workers are responsible for dealing with pediatric victims of violence. While the awareness and reporting of suspected cases are rising, there is a lack of research that proves the awareness, knowledge, and attitude of healthcare students. Objectives We evaluated the awareness of child abuse and neglect and examined the demographic factors associated with them. Participants and setting The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University in Jeddah with a sample of 237 undergraduate healthcare students. Methods We utilized the quantitative design and surveyed a convenience sample of 237 healthcare students from March to May 2021. The survey contains questions on child abuse and neglect. Results The respondents' overall mean on the scale was 82.90 (SD = 14.00). The students rated the subscale "Actions considered as child neglect" as the highest (M = 4.18, SD = 1.08), followed by "Actions considered as child abuse" (M = 4.04, SD = 1.21), "Reasons for under-reporting child abuse and neglect cases in Saudi Arabia" (M = 3.34, SD = 0.68), and "Knowledge regarding child abuse and neglect" (M = 3.13, SD = 0.53). The analyses showed that gender (t= -3.88, p< 0.001) and year level (F= 5.98, p= 0.003) were associated with the students' "knowledge regarding child abuse and neglect." Conclusion The findings revealed a good awareness of child maltreatment among healthcare students. However, the students reported a lower awareness of the different reasons for under-reporting child violence cases in Saudi Arabia.
- Research Article
154
- 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.032
- Aug 22, 2018
- Computers in Human Behavior
Child neglect, psychological abuse and smartphone addiction among Chinese adolescents: The roles of emotional intelligence and coping style
- Research Article
1
- 10.14687/jhs.v19i4.6337
- Dec 18, 2022
- Journal of Human Sciences
Aim: The study in descriptive design was carried out to expand the knowledge and risk perception scope of midwifery students on child abuse and neglect. Materials and Methods: The measurement in the descriptive design was composed of 218 volunteer students working in the Midwifery department of a public university (Participation rate: 66%). The data were collected with the “Personal Information Form”, “Scale Form for Recognizing the Signs and Risks of Child Abuse and Neglect”. Results: It was determined that the mean age of the students participating in the study was 21.05±2.14. It was determined that 17% of locals received training on abuse and abuse of their children, and 5% were aware of child abuse and abuse reporting procedures. While 45.4% of the participants stated the findings of children who were neglected and abused, 17% were found to have child neglect and abuse cases. The total scores of the scale for recognizing the symptoms and risks of sexual child abuse and neglect were found to be 241.64±31.31. It was determined that different variables such as studying abuse and getting information/education about abuse, knowing about child abuse and its prohibitions, place of residence, high school graduated differ as using the scale total score and sub-dimension score averages for recognizing the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect. Conclusion: It was determined that the dimensions of diagnosis of the symptoms and risks of child abuse and neglect of midwifery students were moderate and affected by different variables. Include more mention of child neglect and abuse in the training curriculum of midwife candidates will be important in the speed of their energy increase in this regard. Extended English summary is in the end of Full Text PDF (TURKISH) file. Özet Amaç: Tanımlayıcı desendeki çalışma, ebelik öğrencilerinin çocuk istismarı ve ihmali konusundaki bilgi ve risk tanıma düzeylerini tespit etmek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı desendeki araştırmanın örneklemini, bir kamu üniversitesinin Ebelik bölümünde öğrenim gören ve araştırmaya katılmaya gönüllü olan 218 öğrenci oluşturdu (Katılım oranı: %66). Veriler “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Çocuk İstismarı ve İhmalinin Belirti ve Risklerinin Tanılanmasına Yönelik Ölçek Formu” ile toplandı. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan öğrencilerin yaş ortalamasının 21.05±2.14 olduğu tespit edildi. Öğrencilerin %17’sinin öğrenim gördüğü okullarda çocuk ihmali ve istismarı (ÇİVİ) hakkında eğitim aldığı, %5’inin ise ÇİVİ bildirim prosedürlerden haberdar olduğu tespit edildi. Katılımcıların %45.4’ü ihmal ve istismara uğrayan çocukları teşhis edebileceklerini belirtirken, %17’sinin ise çocuk ihmal ve istismarına şahit olduğu saptandı. Öğrencilerin ÇİVİ belirti ve risklerinin tanılanmasına yönelik ölçek toplam puanları 241.64±31.31 olarak tespit edildi. Öğrenim görülen okullarda ihmal ve istismara yönelik bilgi/eğitim alma, çocuk ihmali ve istismarına yönelik uygulanan prosedürleri bilme, yaşanılan yer, mezun olunan lise gibi farklı değişkenlerin ÇİVİ belirti ve risklerinin tanılanmasına yönelik ölçek toplam puan ve alt boyut puan ortalamalarını anlamlı olarak farklılaştırdığı saptandı. Sonuç: Ebelik öğrencilerinin ÇİVİ belirti ve risklerinin tanılanma düzeylerinin orta seviyede olduğu ve farklı değişkenlerden etkilendiği belirlendi. Ebe adaylarının eğitim müfredatında ÇİVİ konusuna daha fazla yer verilmesi öğrencilerin bu konuda farkındalık düzeylerinin artırılmasında önemli olacaktır.
- Research Article
50
- 10.2307/352109
- Nov 1, 1988
- Journal of Marriage and the Family
A 1973 study suggested that family planning might be effective in preventing child abuse and neglect. This paper presents data on the relationships of 5 fertility patterns (number of live births birth spacing maternal age at 1st birth number of unplanned births and number of children by different fathers) to 2 forms of maltreatment: child abuse and child neglect. Questionnaires were administered to 518 single mothers receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children in Baltimore in 1984 and 1985. 118 abusive and 119 neglectful mothers were selected from 1744 families receiving child protective services. Child abuse was defined as use of physical force to produce injuries at a minimum severity level of 4 on a 6-point scale. Types of neglect included inadequacies in health care mental health care nutrition hygiene sanitation safety supervision and/or substitute child care. 281 controls were drawn from female recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Dependent variables were coded child abuse status child neglect status and child maltreatment status. Dependent variables were the 5 fertility patterns. Subjects were controlled for demographic variables: race lifetime marital status lifetime employment status mothers age and education. Child neglect was found to be positively associated with increasing number of live births and with the number of different fathers. Child abuse was found to be associated with number of children by different fathers and spacing between 1st and 2nd child as well as by number of live births. Both abuse and neglect were associated with fertility patterns independent of demographic characteristics. However the 2 types of maltreatment differed in the magnitude of their association with the fertility patterns: child neglect was more strongly associated with the fertility patterns than was child abuse. The 2 types of maltreatment displayed both similarities and differences relative to their relationships with the fertility patterns. Both abuse and neglect were associated with having children by different fathers. Both child abusers and child neglectors had more unplanned births than did controls but only when the other fertility patterns were not controlled which implies that adequate family planning would prevent some maltreatment. Age at 1st birth affected both kinds of maltreatment only if the other 4 fertility factors were uncontrolled. Number of live births had a significant effect on neglect while spacing had none. But for abuse spacing had an effect and number of live births did not. Spacing is the only fertility pattern that was consistently associated with abuse and number of live births was consistently associated with neglect. However it is not possible from these findings to conclude that family planning is important for the primary prevention of child neglect and abuse because the observed relationships may simply reflect coping inadequacies of these mothers.