Abstract

BackgroundCritical care is a complex field of medicine, especially because of its diversity and unpredictability. Mortality rates of the diseases are usually high and patients are critically ill, admitted in emergency, and often have several overlapping diseases. This makes research in critical care also complex because of patients’ conditions and because of the numerous ethical and regulatory requirements and increasing global competition. Many clinical trials in critical care have thus failed and almost no drug has yet been developed to treat intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Learning from the failures, clinical trials must now be optimized.Main bodySeveral aspects can be improved, beginning with the design of studies that should take into account patients’ diversity in the ICU. At the site level, selection should reflect more accurately the potential of recruitment. Management of all players that can be involved in the research at a site level should be a priority. Moreover, training should be offered to all staff members, including the youngest. National and international networks are also part of the future as they create a collective synergy potentially improving the efficacy of sites. Finally, computerization is another area that must be further developed with the appropriate tools.ConclusionClinical research in the ICU is thus a discipline in its own right that still requires tailored approaches. Changes have to be initiated by the investigators themselves as they know all the specificities of the field.

Highlights

  • Context Increasing trial complexity Within a decade, trial complexity has dramatically increased

  • Ill patients who are hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) require continuous monitoring and management and the presence of attending physicians 24/7, as opposed to most medical specialties with intermittent care [1]

  • Even if some ICU-specific diseases have been described such as sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), most of them remain identified as syndromes [2] with lack of specificity, as illustrated by regular updates of the definitions [3,4,5]

Read more

Summary

Conclusion

Clinical research in the ICU is a discipline in its own right that still requires tailored approaches.

Background
Main text
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call