Perspective of Sharia Economic Law and Positive Law for Non-Cash Payment Qris Users in Indonesia According to The SDG

Abstract

Objective: In the practice of digital payment method transactions using QR codes, it is necessary to be careful about counterfeiting QR codes by parties who violate the law or are irresponsible. Theoretical Framework: This research aims to explain and analyze legal protection for consumers in non-cash payment transactions based on QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) Positive Legal Perspective and Sharia Economic Law Perspective with a normative juridical approach. Method: In this research the author uses a statutory approach in carrying out normative research. This approach relies on various legal bases studied, which in this case relate to regulations regarding legal protection for consumers in QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) based non-cash payment transactions, Positive Law and Sharia Economic Law Perspectives. Results and Discussion: Research results Analysis of Legal Protection for Consumers in Non-Cash Payment Transactions Based on QRIS (Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard) Positive Legal Perspective relates to preventive legal protection, apart from the general regulations regarding consumer protection contained in the Consumer Protection Law no. 8 of 1999, for QRIS consumers there are significant regulations that govern. Bank Indonesia has issued Regulations for Members of the Board of Governors 21/18/PADG/2019 concerning Implementation of the National Standard Quick Response Code, Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 22/20/PBI/2020 concerning Bank Indonesia Consumer Protection, Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 18/40/PBI/ 2016 concerning Implementation of Payment Transaction Processing, Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 20/6/PBI/2018 concerning Electronic Money. Research Implications: Then, based on the Sharia Economic Law Perspective, it is reviewed from the sadd dzari'ah theory regarding the collection of personal data, which was originally permitted because it contained benefits, but in terms of the goals to be achieved, it could potentially end in loss and harm if there was no protection from the Government. Originality/Value: Efforts to protect personal data are very important because if it is not regulated by law, there is a possibility of personal data being leaked. Therefore, it is potentially dangerous when the protection of personal data is not regulated in law which is very detrimental to consumers due to the risk of unintentional breaches.