Abstract

BackgroundPatient- and caregiver-reported data are lacking on the burden of spasticity, and the impact of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for this condition, on patients' daily lives. As recommended in recent guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, online patient communities can represent a platform from which to gather specific information outside of a clinical trial setting on the burden of conditions experienced by patients and caregivers and their views on treatment options in order to inform evidence-based medicine and drug development.ObjectiveThe objective of our study is to characterize spasticity symptoms and their associated burdens on Western European and US patients and caregivers in the realms of work, daily activities, quality of life (QoL), as well as the positive and negative impacts of treatment with BoNT-A (cost, time, QoL) using Carenity, an international online community for people with chronic health conditions.MethodsWe performed a noninterventional, multinational survey. Eligible participants were 18 years old or older and had, or had cared for, someone with spasticity who had been treated with BoNT-A for at least 1 year. Patients and caregivers were asked to complete an internet-based survey via Carenity; caregivers reported their own answers and answered on behalf of their patients. Questions included the burden of spasticity on the ability to work, functioning, daily-living activities, and QoL, the impact of BoNT A therapy on patients' lives, and the potential benefits of fewer injections.ResultsThere were 615 respondents (427 patients and 188 caregivers). The mean age of patients and caregivers was 41.7 years and 38.6 years, respectively, and the most commonly reported cause of spasticity was multiple sclerosis. Caregivers were most often the parents (76/188, 40%) or another family member (51/188, 27%) of their patients. Spasticity had a clear impact on patients' and caregivers' lives, including the ability to work and injection costs. For patients, spasticity caused difficulties with activities of daily living and reduced QoL indices. The median number of BoNT-A injections was 4 times per year, and 92% (393/427) of patients reported that treatment improved their overall satisfaction with life. Regarding the BoNT-A injection burden, the greatest patient-reported challenges were the cost and availability of timely appointments. Overall, 86% (368/427) of patients believed that a reduced injection frequency would be beneficial. Caregivers answering for their patients gave largely similar responses to those reported by patients.ConclusionsSpasticity has a negative impact on both patients' and caregivers' lives. All respondents reported that BoNT A treatment improved their lives, despite the associated challenges. Patients believed that reducing the frequency of BoNT-A injections could alleviate practical issues associated with treatment, implying that a longer-acting BoNT-A injection would be well received.

Highlights

  • Knowledge of patient and caregiver perspectives on a disease and related therapies help identify relevant patient-reported outcomes for assessment in clinical trials and inform clinical decision-making; it is critical for patient-focused drug development

  • Methodological guidance to support the collection of patient experience data has recently been published by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which includes the utilization of online patient communities [1]

  • The results presented here supplement efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment for spasticity with information on treatment benefits to patients, the effects of symptoms on everyday life, and practical issues associated with treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge of patient and caregiver perspectives on a disease and related therapies help identify relevant patient-reported outcomes for assessment in clinical trials and inform clinical decision-making; it is critical for patient-focused drug development. Online patient communities offer the opportunity to voluntarily express experiences and feelings outside of the clinical setting regarding the treatments for their condition and the burden on their quality of life (QoL) [2] These data, along with any epidemiological information, can provide researchers with a better understanding of the patient journey for a given disease and are important in clinical judgment and decision making for evidence-based medicine [2]. As recommended in recent guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, online patient communities can represent a platform from which to gather specific information outside of a clinical trial setting on the burden of conditions experienced by patients and caregivers and their views on treatment options in order to inform evidence-based medicine and drug development

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call